• whou@lemmy.ml
    32·
    10 months ago

    I’m glad that they chose the AGPL when open-sourcing their server. I don’t see that many companies, especially ones offering a “product”, open-sourcing their work with a copyleft license.

    • PeachMan@lemmy.world
      8·
      10 months ago

      Looks like it’s not really designed to be self hosted yet. So, if you’re self hosting, Immich is still probably the way.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    12·
    10 months ago

    For now it seems like you need to modify and build the apps yourself to be able to use the newly open sourced backend server. This doesn’t make it very realistic to use for self-hosters.

    If they ever change that, it might be worth another look.

    • grue@lemmy.worldEnglish
      8·
      10 months ago

      If they’re nice enough to use the AGPL, I have some faith that they’ll also improve it for self-hosting.

  • delirious_owl@discuss.online
    3·
    10 months ago

    What’s the benefit of this over shotwell?

    Why does it need to be encrypted if it never leaves my device? I dont get it

    • Contend6248@feddit.de
      4·
      10 months ago

      It does leave your device, it’s connecting to either self hosted server or paid service cloud

    • bloubz@lemmygrad.ml
      1·
      10 months ago

      I don’t think it has anything to do with shotwell. This is a server software that you can now self host to host your photos

    • Contend6248@feddit.de
      112·
      10 months ago

      Some kind of marketing is better than having some or no documentation what it even does.

      To be fair though, calling an open-source project “product” is really weird and gives away how they see it. As long as it’s free and the code is all there, the worst thing would be that the users have to migrate to a fork.

      It is a paid service.

      I’ll give it a spin

      Nevermind, this isn’t self hosted. There is no way i upload all my pictures to anyone else, encrypted or not.

      If anyone cares about a self-hosted solution: https://github.com/LibrePhotos/librephotos

    • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
      4·
      10 months ago

      Also, this exact post, down to the word structure, shows up in these and similar communities every once in a while. I’m convinced this is a dark pattern marketing scheme - pretending to be a good faith user in these communities while secretly pushing this app as the prime directive.

      This is probably the third or fourth time I’m seeing this post.

  • _edge@discuss.tchncs.de
    2·
    10 months ago

    I’m looking a for photo-storage option for the long-run.

    Open-source is not a must, but nice. E2E encryption is not a must, but nice.

    I just want to place to store, edit(?), categorize, search, share my photos. And I don’t want to the place to be Google, Apple, or Microsoft. So, this does look interesting.

    However, I also want to low-maintenance, low-cost, stable long-term solution. I value convenience.

    What options should I consider?

    • bdonvrA
      7·
      10 months ago

      Immich is a perfect photos app, and although still under heavy development it is quite polished already.

      Low maintenance depends on your definition I suppose. As it’s under heavy development you do need to often change the config with a new update.

      But it has a Google Photos like interface, facial recognition and object/scene recognition and searchability (all of this is done locally on the server), etc.

      • umfk@lemmy.world
        2·
        10 months ago

        Immich is absolutely not perfect yet for every use case. A lot of people are looking for a photo server that can be used together with an existing Digikam archive and while Immich has recently added a read-only mode it still does not have good support for hierarchical tags which is necessary for that use case. I hope they will add that feature soon.

      • reap@lemmy.world
        1·
        10 months ago

        What would be the best way to set it up on a raspberry pi, keeping in mind privacy & security?

    • Confound4082@lemmy.ml
      51·
      10 months ago

      Proton Drive just added photo backup to their app. It’s new, and lacking features, but automatic backups and sharing are working.

      The whole proton suite is pretty good, I’ve been very pleased.

      • bloubz@lemmygrad.ml
        1·
        10 months ago

        Indeed I’m very please by this new feature as well, I was waiting for it for quite some time. Although Proton values privacy, it’s still proprietary software, centralized and not self-hosted

    • grue@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      10 months ago

      I’m looking a for photo-storage option for the long-run.

      Open-source is not a must

      If you’re looking for anything “for the long run” then open source should be a must, because everything else will eventually become unsupported and without source code access you’d have no recourse to continue maintaining it.

      • _edge@discuss.tchncs.de
        1·
        10 months ago

        Agree for self-hosted apps. However I’m also looking for a service like that one by ente.io. Here it’s more important that they continue to operate. Sure, with open-source you can self-host or find someone else, but this only works if the service is popular. Less popular open source apps disappaer when the developer gives up. The code would still available, but no one will keep it up-to-date.

        • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
          2·
          10 months ago

          And exactly this is why I use Google Photos in addition to hosting Photoprism. Google photos is too big to disappear overnight, but over the years I’ve seen nearly every open-source app I use go through the cycle of lost development interest. Eventually a dependency breaks and you’re back to searching for a new open source alternative or coffee to manually use some outdated dependency which from a security standpoint isn’t great.