It does if the argument is about colonialism.

Funny how quick the anti-colonialism argument got abandoned when facts entered the picture.

It can’t be both a traffic stop and a home.

Because that’s not the comparison being made.

Meanwhile men who insist on cargo shorts and flip flops to go with ill-fitting graphic t-shirts complain that women don’t find them attractive and turn into incels.

So what exactly is happening when people wear these danger-pants? Apparently the voluminous fabric gets wrapped around itself, as well as the wearer’s ankles and feet, causing them to trip.

Surely that’s always going to be an issue with this kind of very baggy design? That’s what stylist Clare Chambers told the Metro. “The wider the leg, the more likely it is to get caught and wrapped around the opposite leg/foot causing the wearer to trip and fall,” she said.

deleted by creator

Of all the possible comparisons you could have made to show neocolonialism is bad, you chose the one that saves millions of lives a year.

This is like FOX News trying to show how socialism is bad by listing all the good things it does.

“The victims… of a man who keeps abusing them over and over, and have for some time now, well before the current black eye they’re a ‘victim’ of was on their face.”

Is victim blaming only okay when it’s people who buy Ubisoft games because we just hate Ubisoft that much?

No, my argument is that you got your facts wrong about what happened here and for what purpose.

If you read my comments again, you’ll note I didn’t dispute or argue any notions on how green nuclear energy really is.

From the article:

The measure is an environmental protection requirement to avoid discharging too much hot water into rivers already warming from the heatwave. Power plants critical to the country’s electricity production use river water to cool their reactors, which heats the water that is then released back into the river.

You missed the “too much” and “already warming” parts of this paragraph. I’d rather not know anything about nuclear power than pretend like I do and then get mad when my baseless assumptions get checked.

But go on, tell me more how you care about green energy but not about heating rivers up to high degrees. Or just be honest and say you’re just here to shit on nuclear energy no matter what, and you don’t actually care about ecological impacts.

The reason they did this was to not harm the environment by dumping a ton of hot water into the local rivers.

If they thought they had a good chance of losing that much money, they wouldn’t have made the movie. The news here is more about how their risk calculations were off.

If they were looking at things collectively this way, they wouldn’t be making so many remakes and would be making more original movies.

This movie is the result of the risk analysis of each project, not the risk over a time period with multiple projects.

That’s what the stupid, stupid Texan Latinos said, yes.

If that was really your concern, why did it start with you saying international sports competitions shouldn’t ban any countries?

Oh so suddenly you found the means of determining what actions disqualify a country now?

Yeah, this is a case of a company being misleading about its offline mode and what that means. Like the article says, it’s supposed to be a one-time activation check. Not a requirement to play the game, they were supposed to have learned this lesson with Assassin Creed 2’s DRM.

This should open up some trouble for misleading customers.

What does that have to do with you not knowing that when countries get banned from international competitions, it’s easy to find out exactly why, and that having such policies is pretty simple?

What do you mean “Yeah…”? They already replied to you a while ago and it wasn’t anything at all like this whining above.

Go respond to the legitimate misgivings about your source instead of pretending like this guy’s stupid prediction came true.