• HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never said a strong centralized government was bad, just that it wouldn’t be tolerated in the current political framework.

    You interpreted that as being bad.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never said

      You’re waffling and playing sophistic games that are not unlike billdawg and your political ideology seems to come from the same source.

      Checks out.

      You interpreted that as being bad.

      nicholson-yes

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or maybe you just want someone to argue with.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s rich coming from you, especially after your amerikkka-clap flag-humping session that started with this:

          Or maybe you want a strongman who will protect you until they don’t.

          The crumbling and neglected infrastructure and decaying social institutions of Freedomland are cool and good and no worse than the evil See See Pee because something something federalism and how that’s totally working out great promise guys for real guys morshupls

          • HobbitFoot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was mentioning it in the context of the USA. I’ve been bringing up Trump as an example of a person in charge of the federal government who didn’t respond to requests from states for aid. During COVID, the federal government denied assistance to states that were politically against Trump. Putting all disaster response in the hands of the federal government could cause a similar case to happen in the future.

            • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Putting all disaster response in the hands of the federal government could cause a similar case to happen in the future.

              Claiming that the federal/central government should by default rely, especially in the context of the crumbling and eroding infrastructural and social conditions of the United States, on alienated and isolated first responses from counties or townships or whatever is left in impoverished parts of the country is idealistic nonsense that ignores the actual conditions of those places.

              And Maui isn’t even nearly one of the most impoverished areas and look how badly that went.