• HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    It is going to be kind of expensive for the EU to replace the non-expeditionary capabilities of the US military. There are also some parts, like a nuclear umbrella, which are going to need to be worked out.

    It isn’t impossible, but it is going to be pretty expensive and a lot of it should be built at the supernational level, preferably the EU.

    • huppakee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The thing is, it will not likely get any cheaper while it will likely be become more necessary.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, I agree.

        One thing that would help is defining European defense policy. I feel like a lot of countries are spending money without a target for what they should be trying to build.

    • vane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      France have enough nuclear weapons to start judgement day so I don’t see the point.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, France has it. The question is how it gets used to protect the rest of Europe.

        • vane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You don’t use it, that’s the point. The moment someone fires one it’s end of world situation.

          • HobbitFoot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            You don’t use it, but you need to be able to use it for the threat to be credible.