Hello comrades, I’m looking for some guidance on understanding degrowth.
It seems very idealistic. Where they hope their work can convince people on an individual level, then on an organizational level, to influence policy which creates targets that will decrease environmental impact (that is the main contradiction) and subsequently profit-seeking.
I think some part acknowledges that quality of life with respect to material possessions is sufficient for people in the global north, and they can be content with their current conditions and improve things like community with a decreased emphasis on growth. There isn’t a base theory or mechanism to understand or explain how humans and societies work like historical materialism or dialectical materialism in ML. It does seem to rely on ecological thinking, e.g. carrying capacity. Maybe the idea is that there is a physical limit, we can acknowledge it and work around it for the best outcome for all people rather than butt heads against it after consequences emerge.
This doesn’t seem to operate at the level of human societies which I think is a bit confusing. You can take something from ecology but its application needs a robust set of auxiliary theories to explain how it operates at the level of human society. It also seems there is wishful thinking about how movements like this work historically and there are inherently groups (i.e. classes, but they don’t seem to indicate this in another form) which are the causes of this. Am I correct to assume this is a reactionary response to current political problems using some of the language of Marxism without any of the fundamental understanding?
I can’t shake the idea that believers of this think the solution will ‘magically’ emerge if enough people agree with it or are educated on it. Accepting that the bourgeois will not relinquish their control after understanding and that their lack of cooperation is a feature of their class interest and not ‘needing to be educated enough’ is just ignored?
Any commentary or analysis would be really appreciated, my thoughts are a bit jumbled.
Here’s a website for this someone shared with me recently: https://degrowth.info/en/degrowth
Degrowth is just a technical term for decoupling our goals from constant GDP growth, which is basically mathematically essential for dealing with the climate crisis in the global north. There is nothing in it that is inherently idealist or incompatible with Marxist-Leninism. It is a policy goal, not a theory of how to achieve the goal.
The current issue of Monthly Review is a double-issue on degrowth and there’s a lot there, I recommend you check it out.