The Kremlin and the DPRK join forces… thoughts?

  • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The radiation alone, plus the toxic byproducts of otherwise inert plastic, and other chemical agents polluting the soil and water, let alone inhaling and consuming things into our bloodstream would just destroy our ability to maintain a population, let alone a civilization proper.

    I’m familiar with the SIOP plan. I just got done reading Annie Jacoson’s Nuclear War: A Scenario. And she is very thorough in listing all of the catastrophic byproducts. The military also knows the consequences of even a single bomb.

    • novibe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Most modern nuclear weapons are not very radioactive. Hydrogen bombs do release a bit of radiation when they first explode, but it dissipates really quick.

      • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        The problem is that nuclear bomb targets include nuclear reactors in their lists. Also the toxic chemicals that would burn up and then fall into the top soil and fresh water sources.

        • novibe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ah yeah for sure. The world would definitely become toxic, and with all the nuclear power plants and reactors going without maintenance or getting directly damaged, there would be a shit ton of radiation in many places.