• SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I thought you said average prices, not one state four years ago.

      Edit to add: 2020 doesn’t compare to 2024 prices. This is an apples and oranges comparison.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            The only way I see them working is they are limited and possibly income based.

            Meaning if the voucher is worth 10k. You can only spend 10k. You can pay more. That’ll encourage schools to keep their prices down. If someone wants to send their kids to an 11k school they have to pay the whole 11k.

            I don’t know the right dollar amount but there should be a cap. Right parents are often sending their kids to private schools anyway. The goal of vouchers is to push bottom scoring schools to do better or another way is you only get vouchers if you school is scoring in a certain category.

            The school I attended was one of the top in the nation. My family was poor but hypothetically we shouldn’t be offered vouchers due to the quality of education provided.

            I see inner cities getting the most benefit but rural America will still struggle. That’s a tough nut to crack since the population density is low.

            • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I see inner cities getting the most benefit but rural America will still struggle. That’s a tough nut to crack since the population density is low.

              That amusingly enough is also a reason why public schools cost more than private schools.

              • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                4 months ago

                Rural tends to spend less per student. Schools are funded by local taxes for the majority of the expenditures. When most your population is below poverty level income, you just don’t want the tax base. You also can’t get private schools to compete for the 10 kids in the class. So that’s one scenario I don’t know what the right answer is.

                  • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Since they’d still have public school, their situation would stay the same but it would improve the education of millions of poor minority children.

                    I think that’s a good thing.

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ohio is spending more per pupil in 2024, they are above $14,000 but I’m having trouble finding the report. The trend is still the same it’s significantly more to educate a kid in public school.