• Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Since they’d still have public school, their situation would stay the same but it would improve the education of millions of poor minority children.

      I think that’s a good thing.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Or it improves. It’s their choice. Right now public schools have a monopoly and vouchers break that monopoly. They can either improve or fail.

          Either way the children benefit with a better education and that is what is important.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 months ago

              We’ve already done in to inner city kids since the 1970’s.

              I am a big advocate the education is the way to solve income disparity. The solution isn’t wealth distraction. It’s making sure every child has a quality education.

              Also when you first start there will be a limit to capacity. The private schools around today would be the ones children could attend. It’s take awhile to get a school up and certified. Overnight there would be little change and over years it’d make a positive outcome.