• Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    At some point you have to take a stance and explain your stance. That is what she has failed to do. She jumps from one stance to the next stance to the next stance.

    I am a Republican but I hate fracking. It jacks up the water supply. I am big on the environment and if someone has a compelling platform, I could vote for that.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        That her stance as well. SHe wants to continue fracking. I am not a single-issue voter either. Most of her ideas will screw up the economy as well.

        • _stranger_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          There’s a big difference between “I won’t ban it” and “drill baby drill”. It has a lot to do with those backrooms and conveyor belts I was talking about earlier, but the short version is: She probably would if she could, but if she says that, a bunch of frackers in Pennsylvania won’t vote for her because they are single issue voters.

        • zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          That’s the puzzling thing about conservatives - the utter inability or unwillingness to discern anything as other than binary, black or white. Harris isn’t going to ban fracking overnight, sure. That would be economically uintenable. On the other hand, the velveeta treason weasel would eagerly sell out national parks to allow fracking.