• blame [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    on the other hand, stop putting apps in webpages

    • Apps were not supposed to be given a constrained execution environment that is years behind what the hardware can do
    • Years of internet and no real world use-case for using anything other than Lotus 123
    • Wanted to do something else for a laugh? We had a tool for that: It was called “Games”
    • “Yes please let my hardware be useless without internet access” - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged
    • DJDarren
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Bold of you to assume that the websites wrapped up as apps are in any way useful if you lose internet access.

    • Vent@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Service workers are supported by every web browser and enable websites to work offline. They can even do periodic background pushes/refreshes.

      My dream is that one day PWAs replace 90% of apps in existence today.

        • Chronicon [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          depends what the app is. If its proprietary trash I’m forced to interact with because capitalism, you know I want it in firefox with ublock and as locked down as possible.

          If it’s something relatively trivial I use once or twice and never think about it again? Better to not have that lingering around on my device.

          A good web app is leagues better than several bad native apps, but good, standards-based native apps are almost always better. I’m taking libreoffice over google docs any day, but for more obscure stuff a web-app means I can run it on any device with a browser, not just whatever single OS it was developed and maintained for.