• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    They’d have more paying subscribers if they didn’t charge more than Netflix for what amounts to user-generated content that they’re getting for free.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They’re not getting it for free. They pay video creators. And they know that the more they can pay them, the more and better content they will get.

      And with any product pricing, there is always a balance between charging less to get more customers, or charging more to get more money per customer.

      I’m pretty sure YouTube knows more about how to price their service than any of us.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Everyone in every aspect of this economy tries to get the most while paying the least. I swear people in here are bitching about absolute economic basics that they themselves are guilty of.

          If you hate monopolies, go pay for Nebula and Curiosity stream like I do.

          • Petter1@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I do pay for Nebula, it is not the Solution to our Problem. We need regulation.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        They’re not getting it for free. They pay video creators. And they know that the more they can pay them, the more and better content they will get.

        barely, most of that payment is from premium subscribers and memberships, people who spend their own money on this, youtube gives them a share of the ads, sure, but ads are basically a fraction of the majority of most youtuber incomes these days.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s not like YT is a democracy LOL

          And YT was never free. It has had ads from the beginning. Perhaps not its very first months as a startup but those were supported by its seed investment capital so obviously a special and finite circumstance.

          YT is ad supported. It always had been. Free services need to make money somehow and ads are one way. It is baffling watching people realize this for the first time because they’ve been shielded by their ad blocker for years, but dude, here outside that little bubble, in the real world, this is how things work.