GOAT

  • Valentine Angell
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Shit on Nintendo being “behind the times” and patent litigation, but they are the console I always have the most fun with. I pick up my Switch everyday, the Xbox and PS grow dust. That’s just me, maybe I’m just too simple…

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      31 minutes ago

      Unfortunately the one behavior negates the other. How can I have fun with their products knowing that I could face legal action simply because I share my love of their games?

      No sod that, I guess their games don’t get streamed then. There are plenty of companies that are happy about the free advertising, or at least don’t care either way.

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I have no problem with them being behind the times, if they even are. What’s really annoying is suing people for downloading games that they don’t even sell anymore.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        33 minutes ago

        Or suing people because they advertised their product for them. That one has never made sense.

  • einlander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    They wouldn’t, you can’t claim ownership of AI generated material in many places. So for such a litigant company AI is a no go.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Well you did think about Mario that one time so surely they have a case.

      Nintendo probably think breathing within 500 km of one of their products constitutes copyright violation.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Realistically they weren’t going to, were they?

      They’re not a big tech company, not really, there’s no reason they would have the necessary compute to develop an AI in the first place so what they’re really announcing is that something that no one expected them to do is not going to happen.

      In similarly news, Crayola are not going to develop an AI.

      • Grangle1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        16 hours ago

        That said, they’re not likely to license an already made AI for their projects either, which is also nice.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          40 minutes ago

          I didn’t really expect them to do that either, because what would it do?

          The reason companies like Google are developing an AI is because they have a lot of processor capacity anyway, so they can make use of it and they have a broad enough product catalog that it fits with their current offerings.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      He can’t decide that and is purely speaking from a perspective of a (legendary) game dev with more experience than some studios have as a whole. He’s been longer in the game than almost anyone else for better or worse.

    • JamesFire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      If I wanted good hardware I’d build a PC. Which I did.

      If I wanted good games, I’d build a PC, buy a switch, and sail the seas for anything those can’t run natively that I actually want to play. Which I did.

    • MSids@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Over the years I’ve gotten rid of every console except for my Nintendo consoles. Sure their hardware is not cutting edge but I don’t really care because I always enjoy myself when I play my Nintendo consoles.

      If you want the 202[3/4/5] version of COD at 4k 60fps then an Xbox is probably more suited to you. Nintendo just isn’t going after that segment. The variety is a good thing.

    • Num10ck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      who would you say has made better games than Nintendo? cuz if you go by sales numbers or ratings, you might consider shutting tf up

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Its Nintendo. They are always a decade behind on new technology.

    Come 2032 or so they are going to be all about how great this technology that lets them create custom VAs for all their characters (so they never have another Marinet situation) is amazing.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      They are not behind. Since they are not trying to catch up with Sony or MS. They purposely choose to use cheaper hardware and go a different direction. That’s not the same as being behind.

      It’s their Blue Ocean strategy. They don’t want to compete directly against Sony and a trillion dollar company called Microsoft. Since the last time they did that it almost took the company under. They make a profit on each Switch sale since the first one was sold and they offer an entirely different gaming catalog that targets a different audience.

    • anlumo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Nintendo used to be ahead of the curve with the N64, but you’re right that they’ve been trailing behind for a while now. The Switch still uses the Nvidia Tegra X1 CPU/GPU, which was released in 2015.