Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 sucks up to 180 Mb/s of internet bandwidth while in flight — peak rate equivalent to 81GB of data per hour
www.tomshardware.com
At least that install size is light, right?

I don’t have a metered home internet connection, but jesus-christ, who is this for?

  • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    18·
    1 month ago

    This is generally how these things work. MSFS global scenery is a large number of terabytes in size. Local scenery is streamed on-demand as you travel around. Very few people would have the means to store it all locally. MSFS isn’t the only flight simulator which does this. FlightGear, a free software flight simulator uses a system called TerraSync which does the exact same thing, however the scenery tiles in FlightGear are rather modest in comparison (in the upcoming “World Scenery 3.0” terrain system, the state of Colorado consumes 513MB compressed).

    • LaGG_3 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
      12·
      1 month ago

      I’m guessing it must have some kind of cache for people that don’t have absurd internet connections. I never got too into scenery packs and extra data for MSFS2020, but I’d usually just focus on a single region at a time with the freebie packs MS put out.

    • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]@hexbear.netEnglish
      3·
      1 month ago

      Flight sim is probably the most expensive PC game category except from maybe whaling in certain games for lootboxes.

      A large storage drive is a given for most, even sometimes dedicated drives and its not that expensive these days. It realy isn’t 2000-10’s anymore, storage is incredibly cheap now. Have a main OS SSD + 1 dedicated storage HDD is a given.

      My experience with XP11 is that the barrier is the knowledge and dedication to do custom scenery(ortho) compared to what MSFS gives out of the box. You’re paying quite a premium for MSFS’s convenience and massive coverage.