I reported that, but no action was taken.
Calling for ethnic cleansing of Kurds at the hands of Islamic fascists should be against the rules… right?
I reported that, but no action was taken.
Calling for ethnic cleansing of Kurds at the hands of Islamic fascists should be against the rules… right?
That is not a link. We still have no context.
I didn’t want to link so it doesn’t come across as I am asking people to go pile up on a person. I reported it this morning. I’ll send you a link in a PM if that’s ok.
But in what context can genocide/ethnic cleansing/repression of a people be OK?
We have no idea if x person said x, because you’re not linking anything.
https://lemmygrad.ml/post/6440034/5649612
Thx.
deleted by creator
It is precisely what I claim it is. What does tl;dr mean? “too long; didn’t read” tl;dr is a summary of one’s points and arguments. Anything before a tl;dr isn’t necessary to understand the tl;dr by definition.
The person summarised their own words into a tl;dr, unprompted. How can you blame me for that?
You’re just looking for an excuse to defend calls for ethnic cleansing because you happen to agree with it.
deleted by creator
You have zero self awareness, you assume I am a part of some group, then go on to assume what I supposedly do, only to then say that I am actually the one doing the assuming. That’s gaslighting.
Can you argue a point without implying that the person to whom you’re speaking is part of a conspiracy?
I don’t even know what DARVO is.
Zero self-awareness. This all started because someone said Rojava were the worst people on Earth, who should be wiped out, and then refused to discuss it.
Stop your attempts at browbeating. Your whole comment literally applies to you, but you lack the self-awareness to see it.
deleted by creator
No, I am not.
No, I didn’t. Where did I mention myself as being the victim? I think you’re arguing against someone else here…
I did though. I copied the whole “tl;dr”. How can the person ranting about China be relevant to whether or not Kurds should be ethnically cleansed from northern Syria?
You wanted to see the “context” because apparently calling for genocide as part of a longer discussion isn’t as bad as outright calling for it. I don’t understand the logic.
The only person manipulating here is you. You accuse me of a million things. So far you have not said 1 thing in defense of the person saying what I quoted in my post. Is it because you know its indefensible so you attack me instead?
doesn’t fit with
They did say the things, you’ve probably read the comment by now. I don’t know why you’re saying “if” when it is something we can all see with our eyes.
Are we judging what they said or the context in which they said it in? Ironic that Kurds receiving help from the US is bad no matter how you look at it (context be damned!), but once someone gets called out for calling Rojava to be “wiped from the map” suddenly context matters. lmao
I’m just pointing out the blatant hypocrisy.
“WHY DIDN’T YOU POST THE LINK?!?!”
“NOOOO! WHY DID YOU POST THE LINK?!THAT’S MOB JUSTICE!!”
Your post is full of contradictions, strawmen, projection, hypocrisy and lying. Everything you accuse me of in your post, you’re doing yourself.
Then you top it off with pure insults after I have not said a single mean thing to you. Then you have the audacity to say “fuck you”. I feel sorry for anyone who has to tolerate you.
Thanks for the summary. I think in cases like this, as uncomfortable as it can be, it’s important to have the full text so I wouldn’t worry about posting relevant links in this comm. I’ve seen the link now. I’ll have a think.
My first thoughts are: what do you and they mean by Rojava? If they mean to limit it to a particular set of relations that amount to a US proxy, that’s one thing (and quite a claim but possibly not a call for genocide). If they’re using Rojava more like you, as the Kurds in that part of the world, it’s quite another. Both readings seem possible, which is problematic.
If you need more context, this other interaction could help to understand more that discussion: -> https://lemmygrad.ml/post/6440034/5647622
Thanks.
The person I was talking about calls the people of Rojava “terrorists” and then says they’re gleeful about “what’s coming to them”. The only country that calls SDF/YPG/Rojava/Kurds terrorists is Turkey.
…
We have a person literally advocating for Turkey (a founding member NATO state) to ethnically cleanse Kurds from Rojava (because they are terrorists), but that’s alright, cause SDF took money from the US.
Rojava is not “tearing [Syria] piece by peace”, they are actually defending Syria’s integrity against Turkish invasion. Yet this person doesn’t see it that way, why is that so? Perhaps he thinks Turkey has the right to go in and ethnically cleanse Kurds.