• Wheaties [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Made in China 2025 has, then, achieved most of its aims. But at what cost?

    the answer will shock you

    The fiscal expense is impossible to calculate. One attempt by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a think-tank, estimated that China spent over 1.7% of GDP on industrial policy in 2017-19, which would add up to over $3trn in today’s dollars if sustained for a decade. That money could have been spent on other things, such as health care, which might have better served the public: fewer EVs, more ICUs.

    Did you miss it? Less than 2% of GDP. I assume you have now fainted in horror at the cost.

    • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The sad thing about this is that they would be complaining about how China built too many clinics, and not enough EV’s if it was the other way around. And even that doesn’t make sense because cheap EV’s also have an indirect benefit to public health, reducing smog in the cities.

    • KatGirl [fae/faer]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Bold of then to say China should stop developing industry and just have more health clinics when the USA has no industry, shitty healthcare, and spends 3.5% of GDP its military