• Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Can’t start? It’s their problem if they can’t process your resignation.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Exactly. I don’t know American laws, but I would submit my resignation by registered letter (I assume there are still doormen to receive those), and if they kept paying me I would put the cash in a savings account in case they ever remember to read the mail and notice they were paying me after quitting.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not moving from one company to another.

        It’s moving from the government regulator to a company regulated by that former employer. The rules on government conflicts of interest still apply, and you can’t accept a paycheck from a regulated entity while you’re still technically employed at the regulator.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think it would probably be safer just to not cash the check from the previous employer.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      If the job is in an industry regulated by the fda it can be considered a conflict of interest and normal government employees would need to have that approved by an ethics committee

        • HobbitFoot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Some agencies have cool down clauses where the person who left willingly can’t work on projects for that agency for a period of time after leaving.

          I can see this becoming an ethics problem for some agencies.

        • BussyCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Until the resignation is processed they are an employee hence the paycheck. It’s an anti corruption regulation otherwise a person could get a job at a pharma company and on their last day at the fda try and push a bunch of approvals through. That type of corruption is reserved for members of congress, president, Supreme Court, and of course the special government employee

          • Nougat@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Nah. Just because they still have you on payroll and haven’t pulled your door card and logon does not mean you’re still an employee. Resigned is resigned, whether the employer decides to handle their internal paperwork or stop paying you is irrelevant.

            • BussyCat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m on my phone and don’t have the effort required to make the meme but until it’s processed it’s as official as Michael Scott’s “I declare bankruptcy”.

              • Muad'dib@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Forcing someone to be your employee against their will is slavery, right?

                • BussyCat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Nobody is being forced to do work… do you know what life was like as a slave and are just being incredibly tone deaf or do you not understand what slave labor actually is.

                  When you have an oversight position you have to ensure there are no conflicts of interest the simplest method is to say you can’t work for another company while employed in that oversight position. The federal government tries to be even more accommodating and says you can even work at another company as long as you clear it with an ethics office. You are required to sign an employment contract where you agree to those terms if you want the original position.

                  In order to be free from that contract you need to process a form. It’s really not the most ridiculous thing to ask from people in charge of oversight to have just the slightest anti corruption protections that cause the minor inconvenience of getting paid money to not work…

                  This also wouldn’t even be a problem if the HR department was properly staffed instead of being recklessly cut as now they can’t handle a single employee taking leave which they are 100% entitled to

                  • Muad'dib@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    He submitted the form, but nobody will process it and let him stop working for them. It’s impossible for him to leave.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pretty sure there’s no rule against having two jobs, especially if you don’t have to go to one of them.