• Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It also excludes women with certain kinds of infertility.

    The social/political definition of women should just be believe what people say they are because otherwise you’re creating a genital/dna inspector.

    As for the biological definitions, we should teach more people biology. There are like 6 definitions of species so biology has trouble answering “what is a human”

    • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      There are like 6 definitions of species so biology has trouble answering “what is a human”

      We don’t need biologists to define what a human is, though. We have known since the time of Plato that a human being is a featherless biped with broad flat nails.

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It also excludes women with certain kinds of infertility.

      That was my “main” premise for lack of a better word, but i agree with what you said :)