“LOOK UPON THE FACE OF YOUR NEW POPE. HIS HAPLOTYPE IS IRRELEVANT. HIS PERUVIAN HERITAGE ASIDE, LOOK INTO THE EYES OF A CHICAGO SPORTS FAN AND KNOW THAT HE HAS SUFFERED LIFETIMES OF ANGUISH. THE FAILURES OF THE HAM SANDWICH RACE PALE IN COMPARISON TO THE ‘DOUBLE DOINK’, THE BULLS AFTER THE YEAR 2000, AND THE UNSPEAKABLE TRAUMA OF BEING A CUBS FAN. KNOW THAT I DO NOT SPARE HIM THE JUSTIFIED TRUTH ABOUT HIS GENETICS OUT OF CONCERN, BUT MERELY RESTRAINT; THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL MISERY I NEED TO PLACE UPON A CHICAGO FAN, IT WOULD MAKE ME SEEM WEAK AND OPPORTUNISTIC… LIKE YOU, HAM SANDWICH.”
They literally saw this meme and thought it was legit:
whats the issue? im a biology professor with a phd and this all checks out
I studied at the disney pixar school of phrenology
if they accidentally made me the trans pope i would excommunicate every single us amerikkkan catholic and dispatch the swiss guard to kill them for heresy tbh
Thank you measurehead
Skull Check only
Somebody inform Shaun.
I wish I could eyeball measurements this bad. Science would be so easy
I wish I could
Believe in yourself 🤗
Skull Check only
No more half measures
Wait until they find out he has Creole heritage.
Quick, we gotta figure out his blood quantum!
people on tic tok are already going through his family census records lol
Believe it or not, this is why
support quantum physics now
What’s that ghost rider ass skull for a male
Can’t even have a good, faithful Catholic church anymore
because of woke 😤😤😤😤
Do archeologists ever use skulls for gender identification in digs? I suspect it’s incredibly unreliable to use as a means of identification due to overlapping variations.
You can, but it’s not an exact science. Any responsible anthropologist calls it a sex estimate because it’s not a sure thing. Broadly speaking biologically male skeletons tend to be more robust than biologically female skeletons but there are plenty of exceptions to this “rule”.
Edit: ideally you’d also be using other methods for sex estimation and comparing all your results. It’s still just an estimate if course because there’s plenty of room for interpretation of skeletal remains. Plus obviously biological sex ≠ gender but that should go without saying
Afaik they use pelvis, though other bones are also used when pelvis is unavailable, this is way less reliable though.
Size itself seems particularly unreliable. Men can be small and women can be large just based on nutrition alone.
Fun fact, when they exhumed general Pulaski remains, they determied he was a trans man.
With the pelvis it’s not only size but the shape as well, especially for individuals who have given birth. The pelvis is a more reliable source for sex estimation than the skull, though it is still an educated guess. I would be very suspicious of anyone claiming to be able to determine the sex of any skeletal remains with any degree of certainty
talkin’ out my dude ass doo doo ass here but I feel like they probably use literally whatever clues they have available including skull size and shape but probably within the context of as many other things as possible
like I think they kinda just do what they can when they have like half of a skull and a middle finger and they gotta figure that shit out
When the pope is clocky :/
Conclave reference???
I thought up two derangement syndromes today: there’s Rachel Zegler Derangement Syndrome and there’s also Everyone I Don’t Like Is Secretly Trans Derangement Syndrome. Psychologists of hexbear note, these two often take up space in the average reactionary’s head.
![[CW: Transphobia] YOUR BODY BETRAYS YOUR PAPALCY](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/981bf732-cdea-4549-84a3-670fb4c26443.webp){kind=link}