Let’s say better late than never.

  • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is coming from a currently far-right + hard capitalist government so I’m wary of how truthful this news is

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I seriously believe that in an adult society you can set one or two historically damaging things aside from “freedom of speech.” I believe it was Trevor Noah who explained that when black people took back South Africa from its apartheid masters, they didn’t burn those people at the stake or prosecute them out of existence or even steal all their property. They just said you won’t be ruling this country like that anymore OH and that ONE WORD… you don’t get to say that ONE WORD ever again.

  • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    There are about 2,500 Sudanese immigrants in Finland. Why not have a law criminalizing the Darfur genocide too? Or better yet, how about a law against denying any genocide in the furtherance of hate speech?

    Unfortunately, I think I know the answer to these questions. I suspect it’s related to the fact that Finland does not recognize the Palestinian state, unlike their neighbors in Norway, Sweden, and Iceland. A law criminalizing the denial of any genocide in the furtherance of hate speech would end up legally including the genocide in Palestine as soon as a case lands in a Finnish court. At that point, it would be really hard to defend their one-sided support of Israel, and lack of Palestinian state recognition.

  • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Is this tacked on with a bunch of other laws related to criticism of Zionism also being against the law?

    Tons of laws Israel is trying to get passed in western countries to associate anti Zionism with Antisemitism.

    I doubt this is the only part of the law.

    • bigboismith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      No this law only outlaws denying recognized genocides by the international court and in a hateful way.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    8 days ago

    Fucking GOOD.

    Hopefully we’ll also have laws against denying the holocaust israel is inflicting on palestine TOO.

  • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Good, but add Armenian and Gaza genocide denial to the list too. Or make it genocide denial in general.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      According to the bill, denial of the Holocaust or other serious international crimes, such as those defined under the statutes of the International Criminal Court, would be punishable by a fine or a prison sentence of up to two years.

    • Omega@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      Armenian and Gaza is fully confirmed, but human rights violations of Xinjiang not so much, it’s semantics at that much, like calling the modern Turkish state genocidal for destroying the culture of Kurds in northern Syria, when it was not explicitly to destroy the people itself

      • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        Its forced assimulation just like what the US did to the natives of America. If what the US did was genocide (it is), then what PRC is doing to Xinjiang and Tibet is also genocide.

        • Omega@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Fair enough, but the term genocide is far too inclusive, I’ve heard people use cultural genocide instead.

        • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          No, “cultural genocide” is not genocide. There is a pretty clear legal definition:

          … any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

          (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; © Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            It’s pretty hilarious how tankies suddenly start quibbling over definitions once China is mentioned.

            Where’s that definition from?

            • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Raphael Lemkin, who first coined the term, defined genocide as “the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group” by means such as “the disintegration of [its] political and social institutions, of [its] culturelanguage, national feelings, religion, and [its] economic existence”.[2]During the struggle to ratify the Genocide Convention, powerful countries restricted Lemkin’s definition to exclude their own actions from being classified as genocide,[3][4] ultimately limiting it to any of five “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”.[5] While there are many scholarly definitions of genocide,[6]almost all international bodies of law officially adjudicate the crime of genocide pursuant to the Genocide Convention.[7]

              From that wiki page, and I appreciate the just barely academically masked sass about why it’s such a narrow definition

        • HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’d swear that there is a message group specifically for .ml users to jump in whenever any criticism is leveled at China.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          8 days ago

          The difference is that the US did actual genocide against the natives of America

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I need people to pay attention to the popularity of denial of the mass killings by Nazis of transgender people. One of the doctors who performed the first vaginoplasty, on Dora Richter, did also go on to participate in brutal abuses in a concentration camp. Like a dung beetle, a group is rolling around this tiny kernel of truth, coalescing in a ball of shit that ends up like this.

    There’s something so vile about this. It has to be deliberate.

    DuckDuckGo and Google have always had at least one denialist result in every single Google search I have made about the Holocaust. Back in 2010 - in high school, I remember reading half of a book online which seemed to be the memoirs of an American World War 2 soldier, than abruptly realizing that he was starting to say some really strange things. Never anything quite wrong, but off. I did a little googling, a bit more research, and then started running into names like David Irving.

    It’s just such a damn difficult problem to fix. They are insidious. Deniers know that the Holocaust happened. They know that trans people were brutalized and massacred by the Nazis, whether you feel like the “purpose” of the mass killings makes it a genocide or not.

    They don’t care. They want stupid people to believe it, because then you can get the stupid people to look the other way. To laugh at people pointing out the patterns.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      One of the doctors who performed the first vaginoplasty, on Dora Richter, did also go on to participate in brutal abuses in a concentration camp.

      TIL, design of the freezing experiments and he later wrote on them. Worked at the Charité at the time of doing the vaginaplasty, from what I can tell seems to have been a star surgeon. Surgery attracts psychopaths, he probably could not give less of a fuck about the ethics of anything but was interested in the technical aspects. Dora Richter’s surgery was a joint effort with Ludwig Levy-Lenz, generally credited as the father of sex reassignment surgery and working at the Hirschfeld Institute itself. Not terribly surprising they collaborated with the Charité on a novel procedure, it was and is one of the very best hospitals in the world. Not indicted in the Doctor’s trials, you probably do not want to read up on what those people did. I’m serious.