• Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    they were buying it to sustain teslas long enough so that musk can cash out on that original 56bn payout from the stocks.

  • Fair Fairy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    When you lost a technological advantage - u then rely on your country protecting you via tariffs.

    But this means we the people then fund your failed business.
    This means you cannot be an asshole and be super duper grateful for people funding ya and protecting ya. this typically means you don’t throw sieg heils.

    i can’t believe Tesla shareholders keep musk still, think it’s likely gonna chnage

    • twice_hatch@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Absolutely, no sense wasting that lithium. Teslas can achieve salvation by being rebuilt into Priuses

      • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I mean, it’s already wired for fast charging and high output, might as well use the entire pack and as much of the controllers as we can without connecting back to HQ

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I don’t know about the cyber truck specifically, but there is definitely already open source hardware and firmware designed for this. It interfaces with the battery via canbus. It then presents as a standard battery to most solar inverters. I know it definitely works with standard tesla batteries.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    21 hours ago

    They “depreciated” so much because the longer they were out, the more evidence there was that they were never worth that much in the first place.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      consider it fell apart soon after a customers buys it, it probably is at most 20-30k at best.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          it’s more for older models where overengineering for ridiculously smooth transitions at the cost of greater wear and maintenance. Considered acceptable as a person who owns a jaguar likely owns several cars and it isn’t a burden for frequent maintenance

          People who can barely afford Jaguars learn the hard way that it was meant as a weekend car

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Imagine being such a terminally sycophantic chump that, after experiencing Cybertruck ownership, you trade it in for yet another Tesla.

  • Celestus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I’m a huge fan of depreciated used electric vehicles. There definitely is a price point at which I’d buy a Cybertruck, but they’d need to depreciate quite a bit more first. Even 50% off is not enough

    • 7toed@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’ll take one when it’s cheaper than the battery pack… then sell the rest of the damned thing for scrap

      • Cenzorrll@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I got both my Tacoma and Nissan leaf for less than that. As a truck, the cybertruck sucks. As an electric car, the cybertruck sucks.

        • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Sure! But I already have a Sequoia and a Honda FIT if I was going to replace my Honda fit (I’m hopefully getting a slate truck) I’d replace it with an electric truck. I do 120 miles a day commute.

          • Cenzorrll@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            I do 120 miles a day commute.

            Ew.

            But those slate trucks look fun as shit. If it ends up meeting expectations, it might be one of the only trucks I’d consider getting rid of my Tacoma for.

            • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I know but cost of living is so much better away from the Baltimore beltloop. :/

              I’m conscious that it could be vaporware of a product but if it comes out I’ll be happy I put in the reservation. My fit is going to be toast by the time the slate starts rolling off the assembly line.

        • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Yea that’s fair. I’m not saying I’d purchase this truck. I’m saying I’d value them at 35k at best.

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    You know what? I’ll change my mind.

    Fix the long list of problems with them,pay for the insurance, remove the T logo, and I’ll drive it.

    That way when I get asked about driving around in a 7 year olds drawing for a truck, at least I can say it was free and I’m no longer buying gas.

    • wunami@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      24 hours ago

      remove the T logo

      You know how you can still tell that a building was originally a Pizza Hut even with the signs removed/changed?

    • Cenzorrll@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      There’s a value I would take a cybertruck for. That value is lower than my 2010 Tacoma with almost 250,000 miles, though.

      Actually, now that I think about it, there are enough things I think are dangerous about it, both to others and occupants, stupid design decisions, etc., that no, I don’t think I’d even take a free one.

    • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Really? As a car, the brand is the least of its issues.

      There’s a reason that car is not legal in a lot of countries.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Your uncle presses a hidden button to open an old garage door. Years of leaves and dead vines fall from the top edge, and a surprised bird darts out from its nest on the now-opaque window. As the door creaks open, the scent of stale Axe body spray floods the overgrown driveway.

      Inside, you see walls adorned with Kanye posters, Bored Ape printouts and flash drives in glass cases, and his crown jewel in the center - an original Cybertruck, still in mint condition. With a grin on his face, your uncle struts up to the masterpiece and pats it on the hood. The front bumper immediately comes loose, but he kicks it back into place before it hits the ground.

          • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            https://youtu.be/33AP0JnXSOA

            Correct. Most didn’t survive. Of those that have, very few are in excellent condition. Of those few, almost none are all original. Those rare few are collectable now. Furthermore, it was featured prominently in a hit TV show. Rarity and notoriety will make a very, very few Cybertrucks into collectibles. It’s probably going to be a while though.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    Depreciation without a term is a useless fucking metric but I guess it works for headlines

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Are you looking for a rate, like money per day lost? It’s depreciation, an incalculable loss of value which is another idea that has no objective basis. One person could value it while many others hate it and it doesn’t change the thing itself. Value is fake. Hating on fake things is not worth your time.

        • jqubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The first Cybertrucks started shipping in November 2023 but most were more after the start of 2024, so at best it’s a 1½ year period.

          The article showed a screenshot of an owner who had tried Tesla’s online trade-in estimate with a 2024 that had only 6,211 miles on it.

          From the article:

          Tesla sold a brand-new 2024 Cybertruck AWD Foundation Series for $100,000. Now, with only 6,000 miles on the odometer, Tesla is offering $65,400 for it – 34.6% depreciation in just a year.

          Pickup trucks generally lose about 20% of their value after a year and 34% after about 3-4 years.

          It’s also wroth nothing that Tesla’s online “trade-in estimates” are often higher than the final offer as noted in the footnote o fhte [sic] screenshot above.

          On Car Guru, the Cybertruck’s depreciation is actually closer to 45% after a year and that’s more representative of the offers owners should expect from dealers.

          EDIT: corrected mileage from screenshot

        • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Maybe you should read the article then before commenting since it calls out that the car has been on sale for 1.5 years.