• ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Have you never worked in an office before? IT doesn’t just let you install whatever you want on work machines.

      We know alternatives exist… They’re not always available.

          • kadup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Recruiter: “Oh, I see you left your previous company soon after joining, what happened there?”

            “They used Microsoft products, so I refused to touch the computers”

            Recruiter “…”

          • Nalivai@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Depends. It’s a factor. My previous employer was acquired by enormous American megacorp, and the first thing they started is forcing Microsoft infrastructure on us, a software development company that had Linux infra already in place. It immediately made all the work a bit more frustrating. Some people left because of that, and they were right to do so, things got way worse since then.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Or if you use your own machine, you still have to collaborate in ways that require Office for one reason or another.

        • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          19 hours ago

          None of my desk jobs have ever allowed a personal computer because of the risk of data leaking.

          Was cautioned about an employee at our competitor who used a personal device, it was stolen and it had client data on it including some of their IP, and when that client took legal action, because the employee acted out of company policy they were on the hook for it.

          • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            18 hours ago

            -> technical device - for productive employees that’s an actual option, but you may have to prove to the organization that they benefit from enabling your full potential

            • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Maybe for the positions you may have been in; had I used Linux at any of those other jobs there would constantly be document compatibility issues between LibreOffice and Word, and in an IT position I wouldn’t be able to replicate issues a user is facing, unable to read Windows memory dumps or event logs on my own machine, the RMM doesn’t have a client for a tech to use on Linux, and that’s just scratching the surface.

              The benefits of Linux for me (no ads, no telemetry, familiarity of the terminal and config files, open source, privacy, sticking it to big tech, etc.) just don’t translate into things that would make me more productive at work.

              • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                document compatibility issues

                Those can be avoided for all documents and presentations that are not written by multiple people at the same time. In practice, such use cases exist, though - but in order to enable my own full productivity I have managed to cut those ties.

                in an IT position I wouldn’t be able to replicate issues a user is facing

                Having to support users of Nadella-Assholesoft (NA) is a whole different issue. No one can reasonably expect to have any job relief because they hate NA when they sign up for an IT support position for NA.

                The benefits of Linux for me (no ads, no telemetry, familiarity of the terminal and config files, open source, privacy, sticking it to big tech, etc.) just don’t translate into things that would make me more productive at work.

                You are obviously prioritizing what’s important to you. That’s pretty normal. However, anyone who wants to and can switch, your switch, fighting the uphill battle to get Linux more widespread. Especially now that the divided states of southern northern america have gone off the deep end and turned full-scale fascism. Any silicon valley oligarch product you manage to cut from your life will protect the lives of innocents in america and elsewhere in the world (palestine, for one).

                Convenience is no longer a good option when it comes with fascism and support of genocidal regimes.

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          only in jobs were you’d be looking for a way out. The only things you can’t do in LibreOffice is be 100% layout identical with the same document opened in Nadella-asshole-soft office (but still you get reasonably close), use macros (and people who create documents with non-VBA macros deserve to be slapped anyways) or use VBA (that’s the real downside, especially in spreadsheet calculations). LibreOffice Basic isn’t really practical to use, sadly.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Uhh, no. There are collaborative tools in Office that are used by the sorts of people who don’t know what LibreOffice is. There’s also certain internal policies that tend to classify information in ways that work with Office.

            • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              There are collaborative tools in Office that are used by the sorts of people who don’t know what LibreOffice is.

              I know. But I do not see how those would keep the knowledgeable people from working in LibreOffice and saving their documents in OOXML.

              There’s also certain internal policies that tend to classify information in ways that work with Office.

              If an organization relies on “classifying information in ways that work with Office”, the IT security probably has no idea what they are doing.

              • frezik@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                But I do not see how those would keep the knowledgeable people from working in LibreOffice and saving their documents in OOXML

                Because they’re not strictly “your” documents. You have to share them with co-workers.

                  • frezik@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    That it’s all cloud based. None of it is stored locally.

                    Remember what I said about security around documents? Part of that is that docs are never on local machines. Yes, there are other issues with cloud storage, but nobody gets fired for doing it.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        well 'scuse you, but you said you were a software developer. any SW dev worth their money can at the very least get a self-administrated technical device not to be hooked up to the intranet, because corporate IT sucks donkeyballs.

        • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          What would be the point of that?

          You’re just saying dumb shit now to avoid having to admit you’re just wrong.

          • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            if I have to explain to you what the point of a technical device that you can self-administrate would be, then chances are you are not a software developer.

            • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              … What purpose would a not-connected-to-the-intranet device serve for my job which requires I check in my code to the local fucking intranet.

              You have no fucking idea what software developers do, do you? You think IT is going to be fine with usb drives being used to transfer proprietary code back and forth - that’s a security nightmare and not worth the effort. Not that it would work because the is be unable to connect to the servers or databases the code I’m developing uses.

              Having a self administered machine, in the office, that I can’t use to do my job is pointless

              Thank you for confirming you have never worked in an office.

    • jdeath@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      i’ve been using open office for decades. do you really think i hate microsoft but just needed to hear about open office? I’m talking about at work, like this fucking meme is referencing.