• certified sinonist@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    IIRC lion king was a huge success, other releases like little mermaid still generated more revenue than their budget by factors of 1.5-2x, but that isn’t considered a success for a movie this big

    something low on disney’s priority list but surely on there is that kids do generally like these movies. at least, I can see the justification for putting them into 3D CGI because I’ve seen my own daughter glaze her eyes over the original releases, but stay completely engaged with the 3D CGI versions.

    • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      other releases like little mermaid still generated more revenue than their budget by factors of 1.5-2x, but that isn’t considered a success for a movie this big

      IIRC the old rule of thumb for hollywood accounting is that marketing costs roughly the same as the movie’s budget. That’d make anything under 2x a loss.

      • certified sinonist@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 hours ago

        In addition to those ones, Snow White, Mulan, Aladdin and the new Lilo & Stitch come to mind. There’s also the spin-offs like Cruella and Peter Pan, and now spin-off sequels like Mufusa.

        • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Oh we’re including the live action remakes as 3D cg? I get that they also use a lot of it but some like Snow White or Mulan don’t really use enough for me to even consider them hybrids.

          Beauty and the Beast may as well get thrown in there along with Cinderella