This is something I’ve wondered about but never really seen an official leftist position on, and it’s gotten a lot more relevant with the ongoing Palestinian uprising. Also curious if there is any good reading out there on this subject.

  • drinkinglakewater [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Might as well tell the folks in Greensboro or Tulsa as much.

    Just to be clear, I’m talking entirely in the context of decolonization. POC leaving under a white supremacist settler state is different due to the state having an interest in them being displaced. Palestinians may make “individual choices” to leave under the Israeli state, but that’s the goal of Israel and its various state apparatuses which ultimately makes it systematic.

    And yes, I agree social tensions don’t evaporate overnight and are inevitably the cause of violence in a new society.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      POC leaving under a white supremacist settler state is different due to the state having an interest in them being displaced.

      The Palestinian state has a real interest in removing settlers from disputed territory. And practically every inch of Israel is in some kind of dispute. The negotiated territory lines were all compromises made while Palestine was in a weakened state.

      Even then, all of this is functionally a moot point, given that the Israeli response appears to be going full Korean War on the Gaza Strip. If the rest of the Middle Eastern states stand back and let this happen, its going to be a full blown genocide on national television.