Critical support to Kamala for helping to kill this dogshit meme once and for all.
beating a dead horse, really. I don’t think it was popular anymore, it started during the summer, it’s way into the school year.
“we’re going to do memes to engage with The Youth™!” declares people who are notorious for killing memes stone dead simply by using them
It wouldn’t even be bad if they were memeing for the meme, even partially.
The reason it kills a meme stone dead is because it’s memeing specifically to manipulate and do “hello fellow kids”. Everyone feels that and immediately gets turned off. The complete and total lack of authenticity is what makes everyone recoil.

i don’t think it’s possible for a democrat politician to be authentic, they are the slimiest, greasiest, used-car-dealer, plastic smile, dead-behind-the-eyes dogs of capital i’ve had the misfortune to be aware of
Yeah this is her version of “Pokemon Go to the polls” but she isn’t even bothering to do anything with it, just 67
It’s a bad meme, so this is the one time they’ve ever done anything good for the world
I’ll post the coconut joke again, that’s a good trick!

If she manages to kill 67 now that she’s making it, that might be the only rare W she has
her iconic giggle
that’s one way of putting it, i guess
Rly gunning for that 9-15 y/o voting demographic
Youthlib Harris???

my 5+6 yr old niblings are very excited about 6 7. say what you will but she really has her pulse on the electorate here
The messaging is so bizarre.
It’s signalling to the base but it’s also trying to be edgy and hip but it’s also (badly) targeting a demographic too young to vote and it’s not targeting the actual younger voting demographic in a way that’s gonna resonate with them. Most of it requires a lot of intertextual political knowledge and insider baseball to make sense of the messaging in the attempts at memes.
It feels like all of it is a 40 year old political consultant’s idea of what an undecided 20 year old needs to hear about Kamala through a shoddy attempt at meme formats:
“Who do you trust on abortion?”
“Vance and Trump.”
“Women.”
omg le epic ownage 😏
The messaging is so muddy.
Kamala wasn’t ever strong on her campaign with regards to abortion rights since she was chasing the GOP as they ran further to the right so it’s not like she’s known for being the staunch pro-choice candidate. So who “women” refers to feels so vague and, unless you’re immediately thinking of Kamala Harris at every moment (i.e. avid K-holers who are gonna vote for her no matter what), then undecided people who are political disengaged and swing voters aren’t gonna stare at that “meme” and connect the notion of trusting women to the notion of trusting Kamala to the notion that it’s promising that Kamala will defend women’s right to healthcare.
It’s also really weak willed since it’s Walz, a man, saying to trust women. So within the “diegetic” of the so-called meme, there’s one woman and she’s a journalist asking the question so it feels like she doesn’t really know? It’s just not a good tweet at all.
Even the bio is smug and posturing - “Elon wouldn’t let us have @headquarters”. That comes off as really entitled. It’s not like headquarters is something that feels like KamalaHQ has a justifiable right to. It’s just a vague term. Undecided people aren’t gonna look at that and think “Gee, Elon is mean and Kamala is the victim here” they’re gonna think “Why would you have a right to that Twitter handle just because you decided that your campaign name was going to be called Headquarters and why would anyone be okay with you getting to steal @Headquarters from someone else?” Idk maybe I’m too clouded by my own perspective but I just don’t see a focus group really connecting with the idea that Elon Musk has snubbed the campaign or that there’s injustice at play here, it just feels like entitlement.
some 15 year-olds will be able to
in 2028:old-pedo-professor:
Even college students did 6-7, I’ve seen it. It might’ve started with Gen Alpha, but it spread to Gen Z, who are as old as like 30 now.
But the real issue is that it’s too little, too late. They could’ve pulled 6-7 off if it was earlier, and perhaps if they made the 6-7 reference actually make sense.
It’s not a joke. Kamala launched her campaign to become the 67th president in the year 2104.
“Zamala HarriZ”


8 years ago doge was cringe. Today it’s an actual department of the government that’s denying you healthcare. And who says we don’t have progress?
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Imagine being forced to write a puff piece about the cringiest thing of 2026 so far
Please no
damn, they got bullied into changing it to 68 already. lmao
McKinsey consultants have determined renaming it to 1488 would garner 2% of the republican vote
Holy shit, all of the posts are cringe. idk what I was expecting, but surely something better than … this
Too little, too late.
To quote the memes of yore “silence brand”
What do they mean by ‘social media brand’ exactly(cbf to watch the video), are we getting LibSocial?
It appears to be an unholy mixture of BuzzFeed, Pod Save America, and skibidi toilet
Probably some grift to launch a website and yada yada














