• Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    10 days ago

    The invisible hand of the free market will determine if it is worth the investment to nuke the planet or not. This is the best system humanity can possibly come up with

  • christian [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 days ago

    Can you bet against nuclear weapons being set off in a specific location? Like If I live in Detroit can I bet my life savings against myself dying in a nuclear holocaust in Detroit before 2027?

    If I became a celebrity could I bet my life savings against myself specifically dying before a specific date? Would there be any drawback?

    • corgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]@hexbear.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 days ago

      If I became a celebrity could I bet my life savings against myself specifically dying before a specific date? Would there be any drawback?

      Idk you could probably do it, I just assume this shit to be rediculous.

    • JustSo [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      If I became a celebrity could I bet my life savings against myself specifically dying before a specific date? Would there be any drawback?

      smh big tech disrupting the euthanasia industry

    • the rizzler@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      are backpack nukes a thing or are the preppers working themselves up over nothing again? cause accidentally calling a hit on yourself is a hell of a way to go

  • CthulhusIntern [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 days ago

    Interesting bet, there’s literally no way to win. If it doesn’t happen, you lose the bet. If it does, then the currency has no more value anymore.

    • FlakesBongler [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      If I ever get the chance to make my Fallout game, Fallout: Great Midwest, I will have to put a reference to this in it

      I already have the Vault-Tec executive board be the villains, having started the war by bribing several higher-ups into false-flagging a nuclear attack, and attempt to utilize their superior position to achieve their ultimate goal

      Rebuilding the world as their corporate subsidiary, using the technology developed in the Vaults to both extend their own lives and to subjugate any survivors they can get their hands on

      Oh, and the Vault-Tec Executive Vault is underneath Lake Michigan and you can flood it to kill them all

      • Euergetes [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 days ago

        Fallout: Great Midwest

        Fallout: Tactics II. it is IMPERATIVE women in the brotherhood of steel wear metal catsuits. you’re in for a heap of trouble harmonizing the vault storyline with the fact the BOS went all the way to NORAD already. unless you do a prequel

        • FlakesBongler [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 days ago

          I follow Mad Max rules when it comes to Fallout

          This is the tale of the one they called the Warlord, who went up against the factions of the Great Midwest and came out victorious

          Canonicity is fine as long as it doesn’t get in the way of the story

          • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            but the whole story is the story. being inconsistent just makes everything worse.

            you wouldn’t fuck up a novel for one chapter.

            you wouldn’t fuck up a chapter for one page.

            you wouldn’t fuck up a page for one sentence.

            why would you fuck up three books for one book?

            • FlakesBongler [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 days ago

              Because none of the books were written by the same people

              They already don’t follow each other closely and let’s be frank, the Bethesda Fallout games are dogshit anyway

              Tactics was more whitewashing of the Brotherhood of Steel and the less said about Fallout: BoS the better

              I want to tell a brand new story with new ideas so that we don’t get the same shit with Star Wars where it’s just the same story told over and over

              • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                I want to tell a brand new story with new ideas

                ok so that shouldn’t be in the fallout universe then?

                Star Wars where it’s just the same story told over and over

                i’ve read a hundred something star wars books that’s only an accurate description of the films and everybody thinks the prequels and sequels are bad shrug-outta-hecks

                • FlakesBongler [they/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  ok so that shouldn’t be in the fallout universe then?

                  Except there’s loads of interesting concepts and ideas that you could do in the Fallout universe, but it always boils down to the Brotherhood and/or the Enclave. All sorts of groups would form in the aftermath of a devastating war and yet, it’s always the fascists in power armor that get the attention. (I wonder why that would be?) soviet-hmm

                  I’ve read a hundred something star wars books

                  And yet, most of those are now no longer canonical and instead of coming up with new ideas, they’re just skimming them to bring back the stuff that people liked

                  If being a comic book enthusiast has taught me anything, it’s that canonicity is a trap. Hew too closely and your work becomes repetitive, you have to step away to make a mark.