The Lemmy Club
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Matty Roses@lemmy.today to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 day ago

EU parliament votes against scanning of private chats

www.patrick-breyer.de

external-link
message-square
22
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • stupidpol@sh.itjust.works
  • PurchaseWithPurpose@lemmy.world
  • privacy@programming.dev
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • wolnyinternet@szmer.info
  • news@hexbear.net
  • upliftingnews@lemmy.world
  • privacy@lemmy.world
  • europe@feddit.org
324
external-link

EU parliament votes against scanning of private chats

www.patrick-breyer.de

Matty Roses@lemmy.today to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 day ago
message-square
22
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • stupidpol@sh.itjust.works
  • PurchaseWithPurpose@lemmy.world
  • privacy@programming.dev
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • wolnyinternet@szmer.info
  • news@hexbear.net
  • upliftingnews@lemmy.world
  • privacy@lemmy.world
  • europe@feddit.org
Historic Chat Control Vote in the EU Parliament: MEPs Vote to End Untargeted Mass Scanning of Private Chats
www.patrick-breyer.de
external-link
In a sensational turn of events in the fight against Chat Control, a majority in the European Parliament voted today to end the untargeted mass scanning of private communications. In doing so, the Parliament firmly rejected the error-prone and unconstitutional surveillance practices of recent years.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/49179218

alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Twongo [she/her]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    isn´t this like the 3rd time already? lol I talked to a few MEPs about chat control and other stuff - while the focus was on chat control the EU got this shit sneakily approved

    • hhg@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Why is that bad? The linked article barely says anything

      • Twongo [she/her]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        sorry, this should provide more context (german though)

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Comes back again and again.

  • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    The push for Chat Control is heavily driven by foreign-funded lobby groups and tech vendors.

    • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      skill issue. have they thought about passing a “russian” (oooooh scary!) NGO law?

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      You don’t say!

  • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Is this AI generated?

    It has an m-dash and uses the phrase “hard facts”.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Around 99% of all chat reports sent to police in Europe come from a single US corporation: Meta. US tech giants are acting as private auxiliary police forces—without any effective European oversight.

    Thats very interesting. Assuming that whatsapp is actually e2ee that means instagram, facebook and threads account for 99% of all chat reports. That means all dms on there have been getting scanned. Sounds like people should leave those platforms.

    • lumen@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not true for WhatsApp. It has a report function that forwards the last 5 messages in the conversation to Meta when used.

      • bless@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Could it be that the client (who has the keys to decrypt the message) just forwards those messages when the report is sent?

        • lumen@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yes, that’s exactly how it works.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Didnt know that, i think i havent used it for over a decade.

    • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Or maybe people are mislead by (and putting to much trust in) the term “end-to-end encryption”

      Sure its encrypted in transit between you and the person you’re exchanging messages with.

      But that doesnt mean the Whatsapp app itself isnt scanning your chats on the phone.

    • RblScmNerfHerder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep. Ugh, garbage companies!

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    Thank fuck.

    For now.

  • Telex@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’ll be back.

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    To do this effectively, they’d have to ban facebook/whatsapp, which are the two most popular chat apps in Europe.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      not really. there are several ways they could implement it

  • asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Once again. In a few months, they’ll do the same and this will repeat until the law passes.

    • Voxel@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      You didn’t even understand the context. It’s about a law that already passed as temporarily and is about to run out.

      • Fossifoo [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        “Pressure is now mounting on EU governments to respect the MEPs’ vote” I do love Patrick for all the good work he does but doubt

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

  • Lemmy.ml libre_culture
  • Lemmy.ml privatelife
  • Lemmy.ml DeGoogle
  • Lemmy.ca privacy

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 506 users / day
  • 3.54K users / week
  • 7.69K users / month
  • 15.3K users / 6 months
  • 123 local subscribers
  • 47.1K subscribers
  • 4.71K Posts
  • 124K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t@lemmy.ml
  • tmpod@lemmy.pt
  • Yayannick@lemmy.ml
  • ranok@sopuli.xyz
  • BE: 0.19.16
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org