• footfaults [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Against. The horse has already left the barn (there are more guns in private hands than people), America has a gun fetish (you can’t change the culture that is built on settler colonial violence), and the assault weapon ban in the 90s didn’t do anything so why do we think doing another one would be different. (I think the economy doing really well in the 90s explains the drop off in gun deaths and mass shootings, not the ban).

    • (I think the economy doing really well in the 90s explains the drop off in gun deaths and mass shootings, not the ban).

      particularly the gun deaths that were reduced was handguns, which were not subject to the AWB.

      • footfaults [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They were subject to the AWB, in the sense that their magazine capacities were reduced to 10 rounds (there was however a grandfather clause for all existing magazines)