• TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The same goes for any longevity therapy. The billionaire-backed company that develops it first will spend any further amount to keep it to themselves and control it. Imagine owning the only fountain of youth, what favors could you buy with it? Who could you keep loyal? It won’t be expensive, it will be impossible to get without kissing the ring, and it will be taken away if you step out of line.

      Whoever controls the fountain of youth controls the world. Literally, the entire world.

  • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Interesting idea, but you’d have to solve the whole brain still going through the process of senescence problem. Essentially the brain is still deteriorating at the same rate and eventually dies from old age even if the body continues to sustain it. And of course, you’d have to figure out how to safely “hook up” the brain.

    SciFi can be interesting, but the pursuit of immortality or even extensive longevity always seemed to me like a very very bad idea to me. I like living, I don’t like living enough to want to do it forever.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean as far as startups go its about on par making one about creating replicators but senescence is actually a good thing and we do keep on making cells. With everything else being young and healthy its possible the blood and organs will clean out detrious (like senescent cell) and allow for better creation of new cells. Im not saying it would last forever but it could possibly go much longer.

    • aeiou@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      SciFi can be interesting, but the pursuit of immortality or even extensive longevity always seemed to me like a very very bad idea to me. I like living, I don’t like living enough to want to do it forever.

      Myself, I always saw the point of the pursuit of immortality to not actually be immortality, but letting you choose when you’re truly done with the world rather than dying of some arbitrary cause out of your control.

      Some might decide they’re done at 70 years, some at 700, but wresting control of your death date from luck and nature into your own hands seems a worthy enough goal to me.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think a big thing is getting a society that is equitable and regenerative. Not dying would be kinda great for a long time in a star trek type of universe but in a drill abay drill while we kil off the fertility of the world and some men are worth a million times the average man and some have nothing. That world is hard to want to live in.

      • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Our 70 year old politicians are pretty detached from their constituents and society. I’m a bit scared to imagine a 700 year old politician

        • aeiou@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          One would hope by the time a conversation on human immortality becomes relevant, society will have found a way to limit the damage such a person could do.

          Wishful thinking I suppose.

          I’m a bit scared to imagine a 700 year old politician

          I imagine it’d look a lot like the groups that have been pushing the same issues for a long time - i.e American evangelicals trying to work God into the constitution for the past two centuries.

        • Bad_Ideas_In_Bulk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          On the other hand, if they had to face living to see the consequences of their actions they would have some motive to not shit everything up.

    • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Best way to become biologically immortal is probably to solve aging directly in your own body via some sort of whole body viral gene therapy.

      Then your still mortal and can be killed so you can chose when to go.

      My person preference for immortality would be some sort of live un-interupted transition from a human brain to a computationally simulated one. Only if I personally own my own infrastructure though. That way I can ensure I don’t get manipulated. Then probably copy my conscious 100x over and spread over geographically. Maybe keep a copy in a extra solar satellite or something.

      • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Despite the show being kind of awful on various levels, I really liked what they did with a similar concept in The Boys.

        The Boys Season 4 spoilers

        Using the magiscience superhero superhealing potion did not fix Hugh Sr.'s broken brain after his stroke. Now he just has a superpowered broken brain, that’s super broken in horrifying ways, and powers that he can’t control.

        • Flyberius [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, I saw that scene where he phased into that guy’s body in the hospital. I was eating my breakfast. I genuinely find the attention to detail in the gore quite disturbing

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m already surrounded by brainless human clones.

    I wish somebody would put a brain in them, they can already vote…

  • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Brainless clones would be an interesting and maybe ethical way to test gene therapies/modifications.

    But making rich fucks live forever is probably what it’s going to be used for.

    It’s going to be barbarism isn’t it

  • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Many pearls will be clutched, but it’s not more gruesome then modern medicine already is, really.

    Presumably a brainless human will still take decades to mature, though.

  • arcine@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Billionaires know Hell awaits them, and will do literally anything to delay it instead of repent, atone, and repair.

    You’re not fooling anyone 😈