• unitedwithme@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Right?! Meta’s valued at 1.5T… So 0.025%

      If someone makes $100k, that’s an equivalent of a $25 fine.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I get your point, but those are two different values. The first is total value of the company (which you could probably compare to someone’s net worth) while the second is yearly income.

        Meta’s annual profit is $60.46 billion and revenue is $200 billion.

  • toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 days ago

    Those changes include adding age verification for New Mexico users, prohibiting end-to-end encryption for users under 18 and capping their use to 90 hours per month, limiting engagement-boosting features like infinite scroll and autoplay, and requiring Meta to detect 99 percent of new child sexual abuse material (CSAM).

    Prohibiting end to end encryption for users under 18 years old, meaning without verified goverment id? Were just going full mask off now, are we?

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      We must protect the children by <checks notes> removing protections from children!

    • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah hate that New Mexico seems to be stupid and tech illiterate about this, meta sucks so when a government fails to punish them in the right way it just gives meta valid ground to stand on in fighting back.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Mask off would mean that you know where they stand. But I can never tell if lemmings are fashy or just idiots. Probably both, I think. They go over the cliff either way.

  • Erik@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    … Because

    A sweeping win for New Mexico could energize Torrez and thousands of other plaintiffs currently pursuing cases against tech companies. Conversely, a limited order could be a significant blow. The outcome won’t directly impact other cases, but it will almost certainly color negotiations over potential settlements