• Aniki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    29 minutes ago

    funnily enough, if i understand this correctly, giving the army more soldiers and attacking hannibal directly turned out to actually not work at all, as they were utterly annihilated. instead, the more cautious and clever scipio turned the war around by using actual tactics instead of just bluntly attacking up front.

    source: watched the 2 oversimplified videos about it last night.

  • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    To be fair Scipio did have superior strategy and leadership if only in being smart enough to get Masinissa on his side.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The Roman ability to motivate their citizens to keep turning up for these wars is the real hero, and it’s not like they just used blunt force to press people into service. They offered substantial incentives, both positive (IIRC up to offering full citizenship to slaves) and negative (punishing citizens, including aristocrats, who tried to dodge the draft).

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Correct on both accounts!

      Slaves deemed healthy and fit were asked if they were willing to serve in the Legions in exchange for freedom and citizenship after a time of service (one presumes very few said “No, I rather like being a slave” lmao), and then purchased for service in two legions of freed slaves (volones - ‘volunteers’). They performed well and were subsequently granted their freedom and citizenship en masse by Consul Gracchus (an ancestor of the more famous reformers of the Brothers Gracchi) after a victory against Carthaginian forces.

      Numerous equites (the wealthy class of Roman citizens) and Senators’ sons were stripped of their citizenship and property, and some were even enslaved in addition, depending on the severity of their draft-dodging.

      If worthy men can rise high in the world, it must also be that unworthy men be allowed to fall…

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        21 hours ago

        one presumes very few said “No, I rather like being a slave” lmao

        Considering that Roman slaves actually did have some rights, I think many slaves with more reasonable masters would probably have preferred living as slaves over dieing as soldiers … then again, if the Carthaginians had won, life might have taken a turn for the worse even for the slaves.

  • bort@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    iirc dan carlin suggested something along the lines: what made rome a superpower was their ability to take a punch, and then get up again to win the fight.

    (so basically what you said, but with boxing-framing instead of futuarama-framing)

  • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Explanation: In the Second Punic War, the brilliant Carthaginian (“Punic”) general Hannibal Barca repeatedly lured massive Roman armies into traps, and utterly destroyed them, one after another.

    … it took a concerningly long time for the Romans to stumble across the strategy of “Stop feeding Roman soldiers to Hannibal’s forces”.

  • teft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Personally i’d want the favor of Neptune and Mars if i were fighting a naval battle.

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Funny enough, the First Punic War was mostly naval, and was won by Rome, despite not having a navy at the start of the war…

      … but the Second Punic War was almost entirely on land, as the Romans dominated the seas by then.