Florida evangelist Whitney Lynn uses most of her flights as an opportunity to share her faith, a trend that was featured in a recent Washington Post article. On Thursday, she said, her sermon got her kicked off a San Diego-bound jet before it even took off from Orlando International Airport. She documented the removal in a series of videos she posted on social media, one of which had racked up 3 million views on Instagram by Friday afternoon.

  • Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    5 days ago

    Whitney is another a la carte Christian grifter.

    Matthew 6:1 “Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven."

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah but it’s Matt. 5:10 that they’re all about, “Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”

      Except they’re not actually persecuted, they’re in a Christian-majority country ruled by an overtly Christian government, so they have to manufacture their own persecution in order to trick God into letting them into heaven.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      Exodus 21:20-21 “Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, 21 but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.’

      Is that one en your carte?

      Weird menu you’ve got there. Err no, bad. The word isn’t “weird” it’s “bad”.

      • stringere@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think you misunderstood that post. They were using a phrase from the bible which highlights the hypocrisy of the talibangelist and how they selectively choose which bible verses to believe in.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Public prayer is pure egoism. “Look how holy I am!”

    Pretty sure her book doesn’t approve of fakers who pray loudly in public as a way to get attention.

    • state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      5 days ago

      Matthew 6:1 “Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven."

      • Eldritch@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        5 days ago

        Literally was about to bring this up. The public proselytizers are explicitly anti-christian and Antichrist.

        • Dultas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          And they can’t use the old testament excuse for not following it. It’s in The Gospel for crying out loud.

          • Eldritch@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yes for all the different problems with Mahatma Gandhi. He pegged their type easily and early.

    • bored_boar_onboard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I mean, there’s a commandment about not taking the lord’s name in vain and this type of “look how much I love the lord” stuff can arguably be just that.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s not.

        The commandment about taking Yhwh’s name in vain is about taking oaths you know you’ll break. It was common back then to use the name of some deity or your ancestors who would - in theory- punish you for breaking that oath.

        Really, the only thing we still do this for is swearing in- like for an oath of office or for giving testimony in court (the whole “put your hand on the bible” thing. This is invoking god as an enforcer of oaths and god ain’t interested in that.)

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think they have their own version of the book annotated by one of the more irritating televangelists.

  • ReverendIrreverence@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    5 days ago

    Matthew 6:5
    New International Version

    “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others."

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I remember a sermon about that from my catholic upbringing. I remeber very few thing from my childhood, but that stuck with me. I think because there we were in church being seen by others and being told we should be at home. The logical gymnastics of these people are impressive in a way.

      • zaph@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        5 days ago

        In all fairness the verse doesn’t mean “don’t go to church.” It’s talking about people who worship in public for the sake of being seen. Like this woman or people who only go to church so they can say they went and keep up appearances in the community. There are plenty of verses that require mental gymnastics and this isn’t really one of them.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          In all fairness the verse doesn’t mean “______” It’s talking about _______.

          And this is why Christianity has like 47,000 different sects and counting.

          But no I’m sure random Christian Lemmy user #16 is the person with the perfect understanding of his holy book.

        • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          That is how they interpret it. But think about it. Church is public. During covid, church moved online. And that was fine. But why did it go back to in person. To be seen. And why is there a weekly mass at all. To be seen. Jesus never said people should go to church every week. That whole thing is an addon created but the mortals who wanted to be seen in their fancy robes and such. The whole thing is a mockery of Jesus’s teachings.

          • zaph@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            That whole thing is an addon created but the mortals who wanted to be seen in their fancy robes and such.

            Doesn’t this apply to all of Christianity? Religion was made to control people and that’s easier to do in person.

            • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              I was trying to be kind. But while religion itself spawned from people attempting to cope with the inability to control the things (like nature) that could determine if they lived or died, at some point it converted over to a way to control the populace.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 days ago

    Read “evangelist” as “disruptive passenger”. This is “spiritual warfare” about as much as black trash bags are racism.

  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    If this had ben a Muslim standing up and preaching loudly on an airplane the MAGAts on the flight would have lost their minds.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Fox would air this non-stop as a 'terrorist" pushing thier religion on people. since they are usually a attractive white woman.

  • laranis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    5 days ago

    If someone did this on my flight I’d demand to be let off. Any religious fundamentalist making a public spectacle to a captive audience should set alarm bells ringing. There’s nothing that woman wouldn’t do if she’s willing to do that and feel she’s perfectly justified.

    Can you imagine if a person of Islamic faith stood up before a flight and started preaching from the Quran? You’d have SWAT on that plane before they finished “Praise be to Allah!”

    • BitUnWise@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      It doesn’t even matter if it’s religious, someone attempting to talk to the entire plane is unacceptable

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I was on the plane flying from Atlanta to somewhere in Nevada, why did I need to be instructed on the correct use of the life vest? How off course are we going to get that I would needed life vest in an emergency situation.

    • hraegsvelmir@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      I wouldn’t be asking to be let off, I would be asking them to address the situation and either escort her off the plane or force her back to her seat to stay silent for the rest of the flight, and maybe compensation depending on how egregious it gets before the airline steps in and shuts it down. Doesn’t really surprise me coming from evangelicals, but I would be reminding the airline that I did not agree to be subject to selfish people holding the other passengers hostage to preach at them in their terms and conditions, and this is not the experience I paid for. I doubt the airlines would agree, but I think this is a nuisance that other customers should be compensated for putting up with.

    • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I would be initially quietly demanding they duct tape her to a seat, as they are known to do. Its a long flight, I ain’t putting up with this

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          If the plane is mid flight and someone becomes belligerent or aggressive, they typically restrain them with duct tape to the seat- if they don’t have handcuffs, shackled and such available. (Shackles keep them in the seat.)

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      And let this behavior be normalized?

      Naw- demand they get made to shut up or removed. You don’t need to be the one to take the hit for their behavior.

  • monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    5 days ago

    Great, now she’ll go on Fox News, get a job there. In a couple of months she’ll be running the department of “war” or some shit.

    To her, this is the best thing that could have happened. People with a persecution complex, will do whatever is necessary to get persecuted.

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      All I was doing was being an intrusive, obnoxious asshole and they started targeting me!

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        just like the street corner preachers, very obnoxius, they yell about peoples “Faith and sin” but never see them actually helping people.

    • bcgm3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Now that you point it out, it seems wholly (lol) possible to me that this was her plan along.

  • demonmariner @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    Alaska, Hawaiian, and Horizon are all affiliated, so essentially one company has said “not on our aircraft.” Good for them.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    Funny how only after theres negative press they start to do something about it.

    because they totally care about the passengers, and its totally not about wanting to be associated with the negative press coverage.

  • msfroh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    5 days ago

    While the headline makes it sound like three different airlines banned her, this is actually just one company, since Alaska already owned Horizon, and then Alaska and Hawaiian merged last year.

    Incidentally, as a gold member of that of that company’s loyalty program, this news makes me even happier that Alaska is my go-to airline.