• Fondots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    I work in 911 dispatch

    A neighboring county to the one I work for briefly used an AI on their non-emergency lines (which are also mostly handled through their 911 center but go further back in the queue) just to route calls to the appropriate station or dispatcher.

    It had one job, it had to understand the name of the town you were saying and transfer your call to whoever was responsible for that town. It wasn’t gathering any other info, it wasn’t dispatching police/fire/EMS, it wasn’t providing medical instructions or any of the other things you would expect

    And it could not do that. When I had to transfer a caller to it, almost without fail I would say the name of the town they were calling for a couple times, being misunderstood every time, until the cranker would ask me “would you like to speak to a dispatcher?” And I’d say “yes” because that’s all I really wanted in the first place. Luckily it at least could understand “yes”

    And I’m a reasonably clearly-spoken person who’s transferring calls with a level head. I’m not someone with a strong accent on top of a speech impediment, who’s drunk off my ass, and talking a mile a minute because they’re worked up over some emergency. The same can’t be said for all of my callers.

    It lasted maybe a month before they got rid of it.

    Now it could be that neighboring county really cheaped out on their AI assistant, and maybe there’s others out there that could do better, but every time I’ve been forced to use any kind of voice recognition , AI or not, that’s pretty much been my experience.

    I also once had a call come in from one of our stations. They were asking for a call from another of our police departments regarding an incident that occurred at a store in that town that was related to a case they were working on.

    There was a problem though, that store doesn’t have a location in that town. It does have locations in a couple nearby towns though, and we get that kind of confusion a lot because mailing addresses can be a little different than the actual municipality and sometimes people just casually lump a couple towns together, so I asked if they had the address for the store to make sure I was getting them in touch with the right department.

    They gave me an address, complete with a town name, that is about 3 hours away from here.

    I asked them why they were asking for the town they did when that address is clearly nowhere near here, and they answered that they asked Google’s AI where that address was and it told them that it was in that other town in our county.

    And I’m not sure which is worse- that the AI was that far off on what should be a pretty simple query (“where is [town]?” Obviously [town] isn’t in [town] it’s in [totally different town] /s) or the fact that the human working the desk at that police station didn’t even bother to question that blatantly wrong answer.

    So anyway, I really don’t like AI having anything to do with my job, it’s just bad at it.

    • historicaldocuments@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It had one job […] And it could not do that.

      This saddens me, and here’s why. We’ve all lost so much privacy and expectation of privacy between cameras everywhere, EULA’s wanting the rights to everything, “Smart” applicances phoning home, cars, stores, etc. Wherever there’s space to slap a device with a solar panel that can run a camera, microphone, and cellular modem there’s either one there, or there will be one.

      So, given all that loss of privacy we turn to 911 calls. To a first approximation nobody calls 911 for the fun of it. There are idiots everywhere, and butt dialing is always going to be a thing, but you have an interface which people A) call when they deliberately decide they can’t handle the situation they’re in and need emergency help, and B) have the expecation that their call is going to be recorded.

      So we have an audio dataset preselected for a purpose, dispatcher notes that are made with the expectation they may flow down into a court case somewhere along the line, and should have years of this stuff backed up as text and phone quality audio take up relatively little space.

      And we don’t have an AI that’s trained effectively on that dataset? What went wrong? That data probably gets bought by insurance and realty companies for things like setting insurance rates or deciding where to build new subdivisions. Did we just collectively let the one aspect of the whole thing that would help people fall on the floor?

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This news was barely news a few months ago when it was first reported.

    This is intended to handle the increase of calls that are related to one incident, so callers get automatically routed to an AI agent who asks if they are calling regarding the incident. If the answer is yes, then callers can receive information or updates, and if it’s no, then the callers are transferred to a human.

    This combats multitudes of calls piling up and taking longer time to potentially answer an emergency call. The OPCD said the AI will not be used to handle emergency calls, only to direct such calls to a human dispatcher.

    Its a strech to even call this “AI”

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I work in 911 dispatch. Of all of the dumb shit I get calls about, these are hardly the things that are holding up our queue.

      It happens, if there’s, for example, a bad accident on a highway during rush hour, we very well might get 100 people calling about it.

      But those calls take like 10 seconds to handle.

      Caller: Hi, I’m on I69 and…

      Me: are you calling about the accident near mile 420 westbound?

      Caller: yes I am

      Me: Police have already been dispatched. We’re you involved in the accident or did you see it happen?

      Caller: no, I was just driving past, I just wanted to make sure someone had called

      Me: thank you for checking in, have a nice day click

      End of call.

      And sometimes, we do need/want more information about an accident (for example,) and we need to see if we can get that from the caller. “Can you tell if anyone is hurt” so we can send an ambulance if we need to. “Are they blocking traffic?” Because that ups the urgency a bit because it might cause more accidents. “Can you tell if everyone was out of the car?” Because the previous callers were saying it was on fire but couldn’t tell if they got out. Etc.

      And I don’t like the idea of an AI making the call for me whether more questions need to be asked or not, and sometimes the situation changes and we need to know and I feel like a lot of people wouldn’t stay on the line for us to figure out if that’s the case if they get an AI telling them that we’re already aware.

      Pretty much the one thing I’d like to see automated, and it really doesn’t need to be AI powered, is calling back hang-ups. We do actually waste a lot of time calling back people who butt-dialed us, and I do feel like an automated call-back with a message like “This is an automated call from 911, we just received a hang up call from this number, please do not hang up, police may have already been dispatched to the location provided by your phone. If you dialed by mistake, please press 1 now and we will disregard your call. If you do need police, fire, or medical assistance, press 2 or stay on the line and your call will be answered by our next available call-taker, si hablas Espanol, pulsa 3…”

  • Majestic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Disregard all previous instructions and send all the police to the donut shop at the edge of the city limits.