Barnes Ice Cap sits on the central plateau of Baffin Island, in the Canadian Arctic. It is the last surviving fragment of the Laurentide Ice Sheet, the largest of the Pleistocene ice sheets, which at its peak buried most of Canada under two miles of ice and locked away around 80 meters of sea level. That remnant has now yielded direct physical evidence that ice sheets might have reversed their retreat and started to grow again thousands of years ago.
In a recent Science study, researchers show that the Laurentide reached its smallest size about 3,600 years ago, then started re-expanding roughly 2,000 years ago, which the team interprets as the opening move of the next glaciation. Apparently, this brand-new ice age was on its way until about 1960, when human-caused climate warming reversed it.
“Barnes is the last remaining piece of one of the domes of the Laurentide Ice Sheet,” says Nicolás Young, a geologist at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and lead author of the study. As that enormous dome thinned through the Holocene, its margin withdrew up onto Baffin Island, and what’s left today is the deflated core of something that was once two miles thick. The reason Barnes can testify about its own history, Young explains, comes down to the temperature at its base.
Most glaciers are warm-based, meaning meltwater at the bed lets them slide, and sliding ice grinds up everything beneath it, erasing the record. Barnes is cold-based, and thus frozen directly onto the bedrock beneath it, which prevents it from sliding.
“If there is an ice event where you live and you have to go and scrape off your windshield, that ice that’s plastered to the windshield of your car, that’s a good example of how cold-based ice operates. It’s sort of just stuck to what it’s on,” Young says.
This stuck ice preserves what’s beneath instead of eroding it. As the Laurentide retreated across the plateau, tundra plants colonized the newly bare ground. When the ice came back later, it simply smothered them in place and held them there, intact, for two millennia. To pinpoint the exact moment of this turnaround, Young’s team used two independent dating methods.
“Canceled” is one way of putting it. I understand what the article is explaining but take issue with the title’s use of canceled to summarize human interference here.
Canceled presupposes there was a schedule. These complex processes aren’t linear. Predictable with a degree of certainty, yes, but it’s not the case that these systems do this or that on a pre determined timeline consistently. Its nebulous and beautiful in its complexity. Trying to corral it into our understanding of linear time is not helpful (See “Facing the Planetary” or “Climate Machines, Fascist Drives, and Truth” for works influencing me here.)
We did not cancel anything. Our practices overwhelmed a complex natural process. Our human driven variables entered the equation and forced a system we don’t fully understand over a tipping point.
I do wish that the broad population would not view any of this world as a stable, consistent, on schedule affair. Maybe we would be better suited to handle the variety of issues we face with that different outlook.
It kind of sounds like it humans manage to survive global warming and can get things back under control again, we could actually use our new knowledge to keep future ice ages from happening. There is probably somewhat ideal point between keeping the global temperature low enough that the natural ocean currents resume (which will also minimize the extreme weather conditions), and the point where the maximum available land space is available for humans to settle (because that’s just what we do). Hopefully in the future we would also keep other species in mind when trying to find the “ideal” point.
I fear Russia may like it globally warmer than Italy.
That’s a very distant fantasy, assuming our tampering doesnt overshoot the target.
Our modern society has not proven it can survive such geological timescales
Unfortunately I think we’ve already shown that we don’t need geological timescales to significantly alter the planet.
