Private security footage is nothing new to criminal investigations, but two factors are rapidly changing the landscape: huge growth in the number of devices with cameras, and the fact that footage usually lands in a cloud server, rather than on a tape.

When a third party maintains the footage on the cloud, it gives police the ability to seek the images directly from the storage company, rather than from the resident or business owner who controls the recording device. In 2022, the Ring security company, owned by Amazon, admitted that it had provided audio and video from customer doorbells to police without user consent at least 11 times. The company cited “exigent circumstances.”

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240116132800/https://www.themarshallproject.org/2024/01/13/police-video-surveillance-california

  • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Do you have particular recommendations? I somehow landed on Reolink as the option I’m going to buy in a few months

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I like UniFi but they aren’t inexpensive and to really make them work you have to go balls deep into the UniFi ecosystem. I HAVE that ecosystem and still went with Reolink for my cameras.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah they’re not crazy expensive but not cheap either, and I’m not a fan of Ubiquiti as a company. There are definitely better alternatives, I just don’t know anything that somebody who’s only used shitty cloud connected garbage could jump right into

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Reolink is perfectly fine. They can be setup with or without internet, just remember to put them on their own VLAN that doesn’t have Internet access. If you don’t want to use the Reolink NVR then build yourself a frigrate box or similar.

      Mine don’t have internet access and I can watch their feeds directly when I’m home and through my Home Assistant rig when I’m away.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Probably avoid anything by Hikvision if you don’t want to risk having Chinese backdoors in it. My own system is just a hodgepodge of different used cams I pulled off job sites. Just need to make sure they can do ONVIF and they should be compatible with any NVR out there.

      • soysauce@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        If the cameras are on a private network with no routes to the Internet a backdoor doesn’t really matter. I would still avoid untrustworthy manufacturers.

    • SocialEngineer56@notdigg.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m using Reolink and highly recommend it. Without a doubt the best bang for your buck. I bought a bundle on Black Friday a couple years ago with the 2TB NVR and 4 cameras (5MP POE) for a couple hundred dollars, and I’ve since expanded to 6 cameras.

      I’m in the process of setting up a NAS, so hoping I can get reolink backed up on it for easy access.