• Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s open source. We don’t have to depend on the original developers.

    If it gets too bad, someone can just make a fork.

    Afaik people are just impatient with the developers and have different short term goals.

    • HobbitFoot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mention a new tech stack because Beehaw brought it up as an option and a lot of people have commented on the difficulty of development in this environment.

        • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          ·
          9 months ago

          Rust seems like a great foundation.

          The fact that I know you’re referring to the programming language called “Rust” doesn’t make this sentence any less funny.

        • Kogasa@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 months ago

          It could still be rust. Code is always the easy part. Design and organization and funding are hard