7bicycles [he/him]

  • 201 Posts
  • 3.08K Comments
Joined 4 年前
cake
Cake day: 2022年2月8日

help-circle




  • Shimano Tourney derailleurs are just genuine garbage and I don’t come at this from an elitist standpoint, I’ve spent a lot of time fixing those into somewhat-workable for friends cheap bicycles and they’re the only one I’ve come across that manage to warp out of true while sitting unused in a shed. Definitely not low maintenance at all and especially not if you’ve never even adjusted a properly working derailleur you’re gonna pull your hair out especially with that insane ratio drop on the first hill gear OPs picture has going on.

    Also that website has to be wrong, they’re listing an SRAM MRX twist shifter and the tourney derailleur. They have incompatible pull ratios, that’d never gonna work out. I’d assume it’s just a tourney twist shift on OPs picture there and honestly those are garbage, too and a PITA in to service.





  • trying to do representation or whatever with the character i think is a weird move, since he’s basically the personification of empire. it makes sense, because how is the character going to stay relevant as the literal west collapses? post soviet collapse, they did a lot of bond villains critiquing arms proliferation, wealthy moguls, and even some blowback with Bardem’s villain. but i think they’re stuck in a self-eating loop and they know it, so this is their “shake it up” play.

    what if he just becomes asian again







  • As other people said, reckless endangerment, criminal negligence, and manslaughter are real charges, but ideally we should be trying to prevent these things from happening beyond simply punishing people who do them.

    Just for the understanding, this is still going off of the notion that seatbelt laws are primarily or at least in a major part on account of so other people don’t get hit by people getting thrown out of cars, right?




  • therefor the creation and enforcement of a social norm is how to make people feel natural to wear a seatbelt. which is a minimal safety mechanism understood about for years with minimal drawbacks.

    So why isn’t the dutch reach encoded into law? I’d say that’s about the same inconvenience as wearing a seatbelt which is to say basically none



  • What percentage of ski slopes are public utilities exclusively filled with 2-ton+ iron skiers?

    What percentage of car drivers do you figure weigh in excess of two tons and are made out of iron? The argument I’m replying to here suggests seatbelts aren’t enforced self-preservation but rather enforced safety for others as if you don’t wear one you could fly through the windshield AND hit somebody else

    Skiing at excessive speed is “reckless skiing” or “reckless endangerment”, which is minimally a fine and escalates to criminal charges based on severity in the same way that reckless driving does. In Utah, the class B misdemeanor could put you in jail for 6 months.

    Okay so then flying through your windshield into somebody else because you didn’t wear a seatbelt seems like it would be illegal even if seatbelts weren’t mandatory?

    Can’t you just boil and filter creek water at home? Do we really need to get the legislature involved over a little giardia risk?

    Is there a law against boiling and filtering creek water at home?