Insomniac code gorilla.

Github

  • 142 Posts
  • 932 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 21st, 2024

help-circle



  • Also I’ve heard that prolonged stress can be damaging to memory, among other things. Or maybe it was specifically about depression and such, I don’t know. Can’t remember off the top of my head (tempted to say “no joke intended” to be a smartass about the other recent comment in here). But anyway, I think I’ve been hit by that kind of thing a lot. I can remember enough to function, but in terms of like childhood memories or even things I did a few years ago, there just isn’t that much that I remember.

    Mood. I’ve been depressed since I was a child and my memory is shit.








  • Sleepless One@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlMy company today.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Boss makes a dollar, I make a dime. That’s why I slop on company time.

    Moving “at the speed of AI” is an actual fucking phrase the suits at my workplace are using. Some devs who are already familiar with the tooling are dubbed “AI champions” by management and tasked with bringing the rest of the devs up to speed.



  • Former Catholic here. Can confirm. I haven’t believed in anything spiritual for a decade and a half, but always find a way to twist any interpretation of my circumstances into confirmation that I am a bad person. I even feel like a bad person for not being able to convince myself to believe in the papist phantom they call god.

    Just now I had to manually prevent myself from inserting a jab at the schismatics and the prots.




  • There was an industry who swallowed AI

    I don’t know why they swallowed AI - perhaps they’ll die!


    There was an industry who swallowed slop

    That’s churning and churning and vomiting won’t stop.

    They swallowed the slop to catch AI

    I don’t know why they swallowed AI - Perhaps they’ll die!


    There was an industry who swallowed an agent

    How flagrant to swallow an agent.

    They swallowed the agent to catch the slop

    They swallowed the slop to catch AI

    I don’t know why they swallowed AI - Perhaps they’ll die!


    There was an industry who swallowed automated reviews

    How new to swallow an automated review!

    They swallowed the automated review to catch the agent

    They swallowed the agent to catch the slop

    They swallowed the slop to catch AI

    I don’t know why they swallowed AI - Perhaps they’ll die!


    There was an industry who swallowed a data center

    What a temper, to swallow a data center!

    They swallowed the data center to catch the automated review

    They swallowed the automated review to catch the agent

    They swallowed the agent to catch the slop

    They swallowed the slop to catch AI

    I don’t know why they swallowed AI - Perhaps they’ll die!


    There was an industry who swallowed LLM tutors

    Minds must be in a stupor to swallow LLM tutors.

    They swallowed the LLM tutor to catch the data center

    They swallowed the data center to catch the automated review

    They swallowed the automated review to catch the agent

    They swallowed the agent to catch the slop

    They swallowed the slop to catch AI

    I don’t know why they swallowed AI - Perhaps they’ll die!


    There was an industry who swallowed the hegemon… They’re dead - party on!




  • That is a new twist but the underlying logic of accumulation remains intact. Read Capital for sure but also consider how the platform economy updates Marx’s categories rather than overturns them.

    I didn’t mean to do otherwise. What you say is true though. This definitely isn’t a qualitative break with industrial capitalism in the same way the financialization that happened/is happening for more than a century isn’t a qualitative break with it.


  • The problem with this model is precisely what @Philosoraptor@hexbear.net pointed out, which is that unlike machines in a factory, an LLM is not a deterministic tool. On top of that, the nature of work it automates is such that it requires active decision making, hence why it hasn’t been automated so far. And here’s where the whole scheme falls apart because the LLM is unable to actually determine whether something is correct in a business sense. All they do is produce stochastically probable outputs, which means human is the bottleneck in the whole process. You can get an LLM to generate code orders of magnitude faster than a human could, but somebody has to figure out that it’s actually doing what’s intended.

    That’s definitely an important issue regarding making things with LLMs. Deterministic tools like compilers and LSPs didn’t cause as much of disruption to the industry to my knowledge, even if they did have their naysayers. The human bottleneck issue isn’t what I was trying to get at, though.

    I’m trying to look at it from production of software all the way to its consumption. My suspicion is that the differences between software and physical products – both in how they are produced and how they are consumed – might have an effect on how surplus value is extracted and how that effects the organization of society at large that is, in some ways, qualitatively different than what happened during the industrial revolution.

    If my hypothesis sounds vague, that’s because it is. I’ll definitely need to finally read Capital in full at least.