• SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Do you have a source to back up this claim because it’s completely reversed from anything I’ve seen and I’d like to understand it better.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I thought you said average prices, not one state four years ago.

        Edit to add: 2020 doesn’t compare to 2024 prices. This is an apples and oranges comparison.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 month ago

              The only way I see them working is they are limited and possibly income based.

              Meaning if the voucher is worth 10k. You can only spend 10k. You can pay more. That’ll encourage schools to keep their prices down. If someone wants to send their kids to an 11k school they have to pay the whole 11k.

              I don’t know the right dollar amount but there should be a cap. Right parents are often sending their kids to private schools anyway. The goal of vouchers is to push bottom scoring schools to do better or another way is you only get vouchers if you school is scoring in a certain category.

              The school I attended was one of the top in the nation. My family was poor but hypothetically we shouldn’t be offered vouchers due to the quality of education provided.

              I see inner cities getting the most benefit but rural America will still struggle. That’s a tough nut to crack since the population density is low.

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I see inner cities getting the most benefit but rural America will still struggle. That’s a tough nut to crack since the population density is low.

                That amusingly enough is also a reason why public schools cost more than private schools.

                • Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Rural tends to spend less per student. Schools are funded by local taxes for the majority of the expenditures. When most your population is below poverty level income, you just don’t want the tax base. You also can’t get private schools to compete for the 10 kids in the class. So that’s one scenario I don’t know what the right answer is.

        • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ohio is spending more per pupil in 2024, they are above $14,000 but I’m having trouble finding the report. The trend is still the same it’s significantly more to educate a kid in public school.