• PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    edit-2
    16 小时前

    I’m sorry if this is a stupid question, but what is the best way to refuse to do this?

    Say you’re in xyz situation and a cop demands your phone. You say no. They get angry, maybe make some threats (whether true or not), etc.

    What is the best way to say no, you aren’t comfortable, come back with a warrant, without pissing them off royally in such a way that things end up worse for you?

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 小时前

      You can be polite and decline consent without resisting. “I do not consent to any searches or seizures”. If it’s taken from you illegally then anything they find is inadmissible in court. If it’s taken from you legally, ain’t shit you can do anyway.

        • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 小时前

          My wife, a person who passes for pale white, refused to allow a police officer to investigate her car after a speeding ticket. I wasn’t here. Her car apparently "matched a description " but they had nothing. She told me they spend another 15 minutes having her sit on the shoulder, then let her off.

          I drove with my family through the south. Had two kids in the car. I’m also brown. No reason to be pulled over, but I did have plates from Ohio since it was a rental. Shitty cop said there’s a lot of folks “in his parts” that smuggle drugs using rentals and kods and demanded I open the trunk. I kept saying I’m trying to visit my family, I got kids in the car. 20 minutes with a crying kid, In frustration, I relented, showed him the empty trunk.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      123
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      14 小时前

      what is the best way to refuse to do this?

      try to be as white as possible.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      140
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 小时前

      in such a way that things end up worse for you?

      IANAL. This is what they want you to think, “just do this and it’ll be better for you”. It might be a short term hassle waiting for the drug dog, or being arrested while they conduct their investigation. But long term it’s the court that matters. And the court will throw out anything obtained illegally or the cops do illegally.

      Cops are not there to help you, they just want to find someone to pin a crime on. The only one that will help you is your lawyer. Stfu. Don’t talk to the police.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 小时前

        It might be a short term hassle waiting for the drug dog

        FYI thats illegal (US vs. Rodriguez)

        being arrested while they conduct their investigation

        Detained*

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 小时前

          They can’t detain you in the US for the purpose of conducting an investigation

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 小时前

            They can in a few states. Delaware, for instance, where the law provides them two hours even without having to clear the bar of reasonable suspicion. This is of couse blatantly unconstitutional, but it’s still a state law.

      • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        81
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        15 小时前

        This. You have rights, but the police will lie, cheat, and steal their way into getting whatever they want, especially when what they want is for you to waive your rights.

        When stopped by the police (in America), you say “I invoke my fifth amendment right to not answer questions and I don’t consent to any searches and seizures. Am I being detained or am I free to go?” That question starts a clock for what is a reasonable amount of time to detain you for their investigation because you’ve made it clear that you’d like to leave as soon as you’re legally allowed to.

        As for any kind of force, just stay silent and unthreatening. They’re gonna do what they’re gonna do, and anything you do can be used as rationalization for escalation, which they really seem to fucking love. Be polite when you do choose to speak. Obey lawful commands and let them arrest you if that’s what they’re gonna do. You don’t fight armed thugs in the street, you fight them in court. File complaints and sue when they violate your rights and cause undue harm. Swinging at them or shouting in their face is how you get shot. Let their ego win the moment and then administratively destroy their career and life later on.

        I’m also not a lawyer, but this is what any half decent lawyer would tell you to do. Just shut the fuck up (but invoke your right to shut the fuck up or your silence can actually be used against you) and be as passive as possible so your lawyer has a slam dunk case getting your charges dropped and/or suing the everloving fuck out of them, hopefully nullifying their qualified immunity in the process. Nothing you do or say to the police can help you, but it sure as shit will be used against you. Even things you think are innocuous can corroborate that you’re who they’re looking for, so just shut the fuck up.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 小时前

          I hate advice like this because you just say empty terms like “obey lawful commands” after saying to not do anything. The question is how do we do this practically. Cops can lie. They can just say whatever is a lawful command. This is why this sort of advice needs to be more specific.

          A good example, presenting your driver’s license for traffic stops. That’s usually a law, is it not? But you say to not consent to searches or seizures. The whole reason people ask for specific practical advice is because they don’t wanna get fucked over by the cops but also don’t wanna get fucked over for unintentionally pulling sovereign citizen like bullshit.

          • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 分钟前

            If you are operating a motor vehicle, you are required to hold a license to operate that vehicle. Ergo, if you are operating the vehicle, the police can ask for proof of your licensure to operate that vehicle, and you are reauired to produce it. That is not covered under search and seizure.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              44 分钟前

              Then people giving this sort of practical advice should explicitly say that lest someone get arrested for failure to present a license or whatever.

          • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 小时前

            Courts have ruled that the police have absolutely no duty to protect and serve you. That shit is a slogan. The reality is that they exist to protect capital and serve capitalists. Cops are class traitors, punishing anybody who steals or threatens value of capital. Some cops do some good, but that isn’t and never was the real intent.

        • dudeami0@lemmy.dudeami.win
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 小时前

          To add to this spending some time in custody is inconvenient, but losing your rights being convicted of something you didn’t even do is more inconvenient. You think you know what to say until you say the wrong thing and start digging a hole.

      • rtxn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 小时前

        Important addition: don’t just shut the fuck up.

        First, in some jurisdictions, failure to identify is an arrestable offense. Full name, date of birth, relevant cards/papers.

        Second, if you need to reach for something, say something so they don’t think you’re about to pull a weapon on them. Officer safety is always a concern in the land of handing out guns like candy.

        Third, explicitly state that you are exercising your fifth amendment rights. Otherwise you might run into an “I want a lawyer, dawg” situation.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 小时前

          in some jurisdictions, failure to identify is an arrestable offense

          There’s nowhere in the US that is true without reasonable, articulable suspicion (Terry v Ohio)

          explicitly state that you are exercising your fifth amendment rights.

          You really don’t need to do that unless you’ve already started answering questions, but it is good practice.

          • fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            31 分钟前

            Keep in mind that the cops don’t have to provide you with their reasonable suspicion in order to demand ID. It’s not until court that they have to provide their reasonable suspicion. So they have plenty of time to come up with justification after the fact.

            Also, on the Fifth Amendment I thought I had read somewhere about a case where a man simply remained silent and never once invoked his right and it didn’t end well for him. I cannot remember the details, but for some reason I thought that you still had to invoke the fifth even if you have not yet answered any questions. I’ll have to look back into this later and post back if I find the story.

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              26 分钟前

              So they have plenty of time to come up with justification after the fact.

              Sure, if they have any.

              I thought I had read somewhere about a case where a man simply remained silent and never once invoked his right and it didn’t end well for him.

              Yeah the footnote from that case was that he started answering questions and then clammed up later. For some reason that doesn’t work.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 小时前

      “what’s a phone?”

      “I don’t know why my fingerprint isn’t working” (biometrics are disabled)

      “I don’t remember my passcode” (it’s a pattern input field)

      “The guy at the phone place changed it for me”

      “It’s never really worked right.”

      “There’s no Google on it tho.” (What does this even mean?)

      “Who do you need to call anyway?”

      “Can’t you just use your own phone?”

      Just act like the dumbest creature on earth.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      11 小时前

      Depends on local laws, but if the cops ability to seize your property without warrant isn’t protected by local laws:

      Ask if they have a warrant and if they don’t then take your phone oout and power it down, then put it back in your pocket and tell them they can direct complaints to your lawyer because you’re not handing over any devices.

      If they seize it without a warrant then you can sue the department, although if they have reasonable suspicion then you won’t have much luck.

    • dudeami0@lemmy.dudeami.win
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      edit-2
      15 小时前

      Just the act of refusing makes the act of seizing your phone legal or not. If you legally give them your phone by your own will, they are able to use all evidence they find in the courts. If you deny to give them your phone, and they seize it anyways and access it you have a valid path to throw the evidence they discover out as an illegal search and seizure of your property. I’m not a lawyer but that is the general thought process on denying them access to your property.

      Edit: Just want to say this mostly pretains to United States law and similar legal structures. This advice is not applicable everywhere and you should research your countries rights and legal protections.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 小时前

      Disable biometrics

      Android: look up “lockdown mode”

      iOS: hold volume down + power, or press power 5 times fast.

      • Broken@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 小时前

        Additionally, running GrapheneOS you can set up a duress pin to wipe the phone profiles if things were to escalate.

        Being smart, set up the main profile a bit to look real, but have no actual information. That way it’s not obvious tha its been wiped.

        Being cheeky, set the duress pin to be something simple like your birthday. So if you are detained/arrested and they try to get into your phone they are the ones to wipe it for you.

      • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 小时前

        Better: restart the phone. This puts it into the safest state it has, as it has not yet been initially unlocked and will require a non-bio auth. Stronger security, may/should hold if they attempt to attack/hack/compromise it, if it comes to that. Takes like 3 seconds. Do it, not the equal-time-worse-security version of just disabling bio.