• randint@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, some of my comments are done with the aim of making hexbear look bad. But ultimately what’s the difference? You already look bad.

    • randint@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I did not defend Nazi apologia. I did defend Zenz on his opinions about the genocide against Uyghurs in China.

      • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        His opinions about the “genocide”? The fact that you recognise that they are entirely opinions and not facts just shows how inauthentic the claims are.

          • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not what “I did defend Zenz on his opinions” means at all. How do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you’ll lie about what you said only a few centimetres away?

          • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Neat! I personally give a shit about facts rather than what some dumbass loser thinks might be happening despite all evidence to the contrary. The Washington Post is a rag owned by Jeff Bezos, acting like it is in any way reputable is laughable