• conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also:

      The firm launched this project after European publishers demanded more information about the traffic brought to their websites by Google search as part of the implementation of the EU Copyright Directive.

      • General_Effort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A few years ago, the EU expanded copyright so that “information service providers” have to get consent to use news articles in any way. So google has obtained licenses but the publishers want more money. Google says it’s not worth it. Given how notoriously delusional copyright owners are, I believe google.

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          The core concepts that “they’re stealing from us by linking our content” and “they’re fucking us over by not including our content in their results” are mutually exclusive.

          But somehow the same groups are consistently pushing both.

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t even think of a way to be devil’s advocate here: there’s no world in which this is good for anyone, even the benefits for Google are highly questionable in lost trust.

    No matter what people think of legacy media and news, they’re still important and sometimes the only source of information. Seeing them missing from searches really makes you question what else they’re hiding from you.

  • Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google speedrunning irrelevancy I see. Their search results are already garbage. Things like this just make me (and others) that much less likely to use them at all anymore.