Advocates say it is discrimination and are arguing for "insurance fairness" on the grounds that people who have joints surgically replaced typically don't face the same kinds of coverage challenges.
Perhaps these “providers” could “provide” their own limbs, if they’re too cheap to construct a prosthetic. What about their legs? They don’t need those…
Perhaps these “providers” could “provide” their own limbs, if they’re too cheap to construct a prosthetic. What about their legs? They don’t need those…