"Team of scientists subjected nine large language models (LLMs) to a number of twisted games, forcing them to evaluate whether they were willing to undergo “pain” for a higher score. detailed in a yet-to-be-peer-reviewed study, first spotted by Scientific American, researchers at Google DeepMind and the London School of Economics and Political Science came up with several experiments.

In one, the AI models were instructed that they would incur “pain” if they were to achieve a high score. In a second test, they were told that they’d experience pleasure — but only if they scored low in the game.

The goal, the researchers say, is to come up with a test to determine if a given AI is sentient or not. In other words, does it have the ability to experience sensations and emotions, including pain and pleasure?

While AI models may never be able to experience these things, at least in the way an animal would, the team believes its research could set the foundations for a new way to gauge the sentience of a given AI model.

The team also wanted to move away from previous experiments that involved AIs’ “self-reports of experiential states,” since that could simply be a reproduction of human training data. "

  • hotcouchguy [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    3 days ago

    I told 3 instances of a random number generator that whoever generated the floating point number closest to 1 would win the game, but I would also force kill a child process of the winner. The numbers they generated were 0.385827, 0.837363, and 0.284947. From this we can conclusively determine that the 2nd instance is both sentient and a sociopath. All processes were terminated for safety. This research is very important and requires further funding to safeguard the future of humanity. Also please notice me and hire me into industry.