• Marte@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I hate Duolingo and this LinkedIn Lunacy just strenghtens my (somewhat unpopular) view.

  • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    53 minutes ago

    This email makes no sense.

    Let me paraphrase them:

    We bet on mobile and won big. AI is great. AI tutors are a thing.

    Therefore we’ll get AI to understand our codebase and get it to fo stuff people did before

    This isn’t “betting on” AI. This is outsourcing to AI.

    You can be an AI company (theoretically) - have people make AI models that are then deployed. Note the lack of recursively, made-by-AI-for-AI products and services.

    Tbh, Duolingo was always a gimmick. It doesn’t teach you a language. It teaches you small snippets of 5-10 words each with little to no grammar. It’s repetitive and boring. It was that way before the lives they said they’d never add.

    They lost me as a user when they rolled out lives.

    Now, I hope they lose someone else.

    Duolingo has potential. But learning a language always required a large time investmant, and it always will.

    I assume its lessons will only get worse than they already are.

  • SeboBear@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    40 minutes ago

    Yai so on top of being an expert in telling all the animal names in a foreign language but not one consecutive sentence - what will come next ? More sample sentences like „the mouse eats the elephant“? (No joke had that one)

  • tauren@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 hours ago

    AI could make Duolingo better because it doesn’t teach a language in its current state. It could explain to the user why their answer is wrong and offer exercises. But instead of doing that, they simply replace employees to save money? What a garbage company. It’s a shame their app is so popular. It gives people nothing but a false sense of learning.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It could explain to the user why their answer is wrong

      FWIW that feature has existed in the premium version for about a year or so

      • tauren@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I abandoned Duolingo 6 months ago. If that’s true, they failed to advertise that to me. In any case, with modern llms you don’t need Duolingo for that. You can ask them. You can copy-paste any article on a subject that interests you, and ask an llm to simplify it to your A1-A2 level. You can ask it to generate exercises, to explain things. Flashcards? Please, Anki is free.

        • npcknapsack@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          When I got rid of Duo, it had removed the crowd sourced explanations and only had the super-premium support in select countries, so even if I wanted to subscribe to it, as a non-American, I couldn’t.

          Mind you, I didn’t want the AI-based version because yeah. I could use Anki + ChatGPT for free.

  • Waldelfe@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Can’t be good for the quality. I already get a lot of errors in my native language: the correct translation to my native language is not accepted and the “correct translation according to Duolingo” is grammatically wrong. So I keep getting errors for not using wrong grammar in my own mother language. This is going to keep getting so much worse and I have to wonder, if I’m even learning the correct grammar in the foreign language.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      yeah, it’s pretty common for AI answers to feel very accurate and useful on topics the user doesn’t know much about, but highly error-prone and unreliable on topics the user is an expert in. … … …

      • warbond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Sure it’s wrong about my area of expertise, but I’m sure it’s right about everyone else’s!

  • net00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Them: this is not about replacing employees with AI

    they then proceed to explain how they will give new work to AI first instead of hiring people

    Thankfully this shit service has never seen a cent from me (and I know 2 languages), and I’ll definitely keep it this way…

    • bollybing@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It was a good app ten years ago when you could use it as much as you wanted for a few short ads. Now its an ad-ridden mtxfest.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        that’s the really depressing part, they took something that could have kind of revolutionized the world (imagine everyone having easy access to learning the major languages), and just snapped its neck like a defenseless kitten

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I was gonna say language learning is actually one of the few AI might be useful for, but they’re not talking about making their users learn with a little AI translator having a random conversation with them; they’re replacing their workforce with AI.

    Fuck. I was considering using Duo once I finish school to give myself some more options to flee the US as we dive deeper into nazism. Any good alternatives?

  • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Honestly I was thinking of removing duo before this. It’s just glorified flash cards making you memorize words associations instead of getting into how thimgs work. I still haven’t gotten the rules of how verb conjugation works in Italian. Just gonna read the books I got.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That’s a bad description of it, though. There exist flash card apps, such as Anki and Memrise, and Duolingo has many other features. Grammar, reading, speaking, those are all built-in.

      Of course some people prefer to learn grammar using the old-fashioned “grammar translation” method, and you are free to do so if you want to, but on average the speed of that method is slow.

      Certainly it’s a good idea to have at least two study materials, which could include Duolingo, or not, according to personal preference.

  • piefood@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I was using Khan Academy when they went to AI. Suddenly my answers were being marked as incorrect, even though they matched the “correct” answer presented. Or they were marked incorrect becuase I used pi, when it said I could answer in terms of pi.

    I’m expecting the same to happen here.

  • slaacaa@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I’m wondering which of these 2 options is true for the chief techbro who came up with this:

    1. They are genuinely clueless, and have never used ChatGPT for more than 5 minutes
    2. They know the limitations of LLMs well, but they want to ride the AI hype to inflate their company value (and maybe cut some costs by downsizing)
    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yep they’re paying lip service to the employees but this message is 100% to potential investors looking to bet on the AI wave.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        it being an email from their CEO is basically all the evidence needed, CEOs don’t say anything that isn’t somehow meant to increase profits.

    • dwemthy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They believe in infinite growth. They think LLMs are going to get reliable fast. LLMs have probably played a direct role in convincing them of that

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    For the first time ever, teaching as well as the best human tutors is within our reach.

    No it fucking isn’t. The video calls are awful and don’t do anything to help you learn why what you said is wrong. Lilly just acts confused and ignores what you said. And in their normal explanations it just assumes why you didn’t know something, gives an answer for what it guessed, and doesn’t do anything else. The old explanations were much better than the new garbage they offer.

    • Christian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Opened the comments because I got stuck at this line for a bit. When I got to this part my brain added in commas and it took me a little because even though “teaching, as well as the best human tutors, is within our reach” doesn’t really make sense, it still seems less nonsensical than without the commas.