dead [he/him]@hexbear.net to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 4 days agoTrump says US bombed 3 Iran nuclear siteshexbear.netimagemessage-square128linkfedilinkarrow-up1205arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1204arrow-down1imageTrump says US bombed 3 Iran nuclear siteshexbear.netdead [he/him]@hexbear.net to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square128linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareWheaties [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down2·3 days agoYes, it’s good to be precise with statements. It’s also good to deliver precise information in a way that does not imply further misinformation. Take this statement: “X has happened” If you reply with “It’s not X”, you inadvertently imply that nothing has happened. “It’s Y, not X” does not have the same implication.
minus-squarememoryfoam44@lemm.eeBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-26 hours agodeleted by creator
minus-squareWheaties [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down3·3 days ago inadvertently
minus-squareAssian_Candor [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·3 days agodeleted by creator
Yes, it’s good to be precise with statements.
It’s also good to deliver precise information in a way that does not imply further misinformation. Take this statement:
If you reply with “It’s not X”, you inadvertently imply that nothing has happened. “It’s Y, not X” does not have the same implication.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator