Organisations worldwide are racing to develop a universally recognised label for “human-made” products and services as part of the growing backlash against AI use.
Hands.
First and most powerful tool the human being found. If that is not enough, I don’t know what is.
Hands are what we use to interact with the world, express love and tenderness and pick ourselves and others when we fall and when climbing.
Hands.
I always liked the company logo for the guy that made the Jojo’s Bizarre Adventure manga:
The little callous on the finger is what artists get from holding a pencil so much. Something like that to designate physical work would be cool.
Perfect. This way too when someone tries to pass off an AI image prompted to incorporate the “not AI” symbol we’ll know it’s a fake because of the excessive amount of fingers in the anti-AI logo.
I’m imagining the Fallout guy with a big thumbs up
Ironically, GenAI had such a time with hands. What a better symbol to represent authenticity.
I like that this approach identifies what the product is, instead of what it isn’t.
iHeartRadio uses the sound of a heartbeat plus the phrase “Guaranteed human” at the start and end of a bunch of their podcasts. I know what they mean, but I do wonder if the majority of listeners will understand that they mean “No AI.”
Agreed. It also nicely plays into the idea of manual labour, ‘manual’ literally meaning ‘by hand’.
Yeah but, how can they prove it.
That will be the job of another, independent organisation. Just like Fair Trade
So, weak oversight and room for corruption. Got it.
Brain shaped circuit board with a 🚫
A retro robot head with the no circle line over it.
My problem with the “no AI” logos is that the companies search for them to train they models with human made things, so you are doing the work for them to not poison they own models
It should depict a skull of Cyberdyne Systems model T101 inside a red circle with a line crossing it diagonally.
Literally allows up to 10% to be AI generated. Charging a fee for commercial use, but I can’t see what that fee is. Feels like a psyop.
i like this one
Unironically, the blockchain could help. If your artpiece is done without AI, you can safeguard its validity through blockchain. It would still require trust of course, that artists really didn’t use AI, but at least once the art is vetted, it becomes easy to check.
Is my “AI” detector wobbly or did you make this with “AI”?
it needs to be a logo that does not contain alphabetical language, so it can be universally understood. Like emojis.
Gemini watermark
I would say the bare minimum for an anti-AI logo would be being human made.
This is also a great example of how AI is shit at creating logos. Busy as hell, terrible line weights, no clear leading of the eye.
