• krimson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    Another desperate attempt to get consumers to embrace their shitty solutions to problems that do not exist.

    Nvidia’s stock price barely reacted. I think we did it boys and girls. The bubble has started to collapse.

    • Fermion@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t see the stock price not moving as evidence of the bubble collapsing.

      In Q4 2025 only 5.5% of NVidia’s revenue came from gaming products. That’s revenue not profit, their other products have better margins than gaming. Also Nvidia already has 95% marketshare in gaming gpu’s. So for them to grow more, they would have to increase the number of people gaming on PC or get into desktop cpu’s or get a bunch of people paying a subscription for access to more profitable cloud services gpus.

      Really I just see the stock price not reacting as an acknowledgement that nvidia and nvidia shareholders don’t care at all about desktop gpu’s. It’s a vestigial appendage to what is now an AI hardware and networking company.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think its just waiting. It will hang out here for a while and then become even more ridiculous because Nvidia is the only one making money so far.

  • morphite88
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 day ago

    So basically they want everything, real or not, to have that AI sheen to it. Ugh.

      • DeckPacker@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think the ultimate goal is to destroy art in general because it has always been a majour driving factor for progressive social change (at least since the Renaissance), because art is about critically reflecting on our society and our environment.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ve got news for them. all they’re doing is removing the monetary viability of art, which actually works against them and their current tax evasion practices.

          progressive art doesn’t need a buyer, or a gallery. progressive art only needs an audience, and when everyone is jobless and destitute there will be a large captive audience that is sympathetic to progressive art and its message.

          • DeckPacker@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, I also think this attempt will ultimately fail. They probably think it could work, but these people are not known for being particularly smart.

            It could still divert some people from the right “path” (learning to appreciate good art though), which makes me a bit sad.

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        You are right on the money. I’m 90% sure YouTube has been applying postprocessing to give videos an AI sheen as well. If they could all stop, that would be great. Half these games look worse than 5 years ago. The other half look good, but have an unsettling vibe. As for YT, videos of real people don’t need to be AI-ified

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          They have. Artists noticed it months ago when their art got fucked. Lines got oddly smeared, combined, etc. Lines they’d spent hours meticulously placing.

          There was an outcry but not much more than that sadly.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Radio stations playing their “push list” so that everyone hears the songs multiple times and eventually begin to like it.

  • its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 day ago

    Important to note with this technology advance - game developers have full, detailed artistic control over DLSS 5’s effects… includes things like intensity, color grading and masking off places where the effect shouldn’t be applied.

    So they can mess with the gain or turn it off. Definitely sounds like full creative control. What a joke.

  • HelluvaKick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Upset they didn’t show one of these AI models getting blown through the head like all of them will when the games are played. It’s gonna look like LiveLeak, and then parents will push for violent video game regulations, since it’s illegal to regulate ai apparently.

  • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Thanks I needed the laugh. That bluesky thread is gold.

    I expected this to be something like that hair fx stuff that you try when you buy a new card, realize is costing 20 fps with no visible benefit, turn it off and forget it ever existed.

    Can we go back to developing ray casting instead?

  • krisevol@lemmus.orgBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    Gamers are some of the worst complainers i swear.

    Your doing have to enable it. But for the ones that want it, we can.

    PC is about choices. I swear yall have console mentality.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      If it were just a software setting I’d agree with you, but it’s an issue of hardware as well.

      The tensor cores used for dlss & ai are taking up more and more space on the die. Space that could be used for more cache, or rt cores, or cuda cores, or removed for cost savings.

      Nvidia should be selling tensor only cards like physx for people who want to spend money on that

    • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      We are all about having choices, but with great power comes great responsibility, and some choices are objectively wrong, and you will be at the very least made fun of for it. This is one of those choices. You can make that choice if you want. We will make fun of you for it if we want.

    • emerald@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I’m still going to have to pay for the specialized hardware to run this feature that I don’t want though. Assuming, of course, that we are allowed to own GPUs in the future.