Palantir CEO and Trump ally Alex Karp is no stranger to controversial (troll-ish even) comments. His latest one just dropped: Karp believes that the U.S. boat strikes in the Caribbean (which many experts believe to be war crimes) are a moneymaking opportunity for his company.

At the New York Times’ DealBook Summit on Wednesday, Karp was asked about the worries over the unconstitutionality of the boat strikes.

“Part of the reason why I like this questioning is the more constitutional you want to make it, the more precise you want to make it, the more you’re going to need my product."

This is bond-level villainy.

  • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    damn I dream of letting this guy loose in the forest at night, butt naked, so I can hunt him with my dogs. They love the scent of fear

  • osanna@lemmy.vg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    uhh… isn’t it the ICC/ICJ who determines what is a war crime and what is not? How would making them legal in the US affect the ICC/ICJ in ANY way?

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      We’re not subject to the ICC/ICJ.

      Never signed that treaty.

      In the US what makes a war crime criminal is the UCMJ and various other us law codes. We get rid of things like “no double tapping” and “you can declare no quarter be given” and suddenly it’s legal.

      (There is a very pointed distinction between legal and moral. Explaining that to these fucks is useless.)

      • osanna@lemmy.vg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Ah. I wasn’t aware of that that he USA isn’t subject to them icc/icj. Thanks.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yup one of those facts that , uh. Well. Speaks for itself.

          (The good guys™️ don’t need that, right?)

  • BigMacHole
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m GLAD we’re giving HIM Taxpayer Money INSTEAD of Teachers or Hospitals or Children!

    -LITERALLY EVERY Republican Voter!

  • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    12 hours ago

    He is correct, but the conclusion to draw from that is that the system that allows those businesses to exist needs to be remedied.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This dude has got to be trolling otherwise he needs to be put in a mental institution.

  • VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    “you would have to make 100% sure of the exact conditions it’s happening in, and in order to do that, the military would have to use Palantir’s technology, for which it pays roughly $10 Billion under its current contract.”

    Trump could do the funniest thing - call Palantir essential for national security, buy it under Eminent Domain “at a reasonable price” (let Trump call it 20x forward earnings instead of 220x or ~10% current market cap), and let the competency of the government run it’s course until the whole thing has degraded

  • desiccated_event@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The quote, from _Star Trek VI:The Undisovered Country __ by Kurtwood Smith as the President of the Federation, “Just because one CAN do a thing, does not necessarily mean one MUST do a thing.” I swear, if we quote the Oracle at Delphi any more in humanity, we might seem insane to any extra-terestrial beings. /s?

      • desiccated_event@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        So, was Farenheit 451 about keeping the idiots from the ideas that were dangerous, or simply convincing them to willingly build the torment nexus? Instructions unclear, critical debate needed.

        • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Uncertainty is a wing of the Torment nexus surely. The only way to leave it is through certainty, but you’ll never know if what you’re certain about is actually true

  • cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    He’s saying we should codify war crimes as crimes in the constitution so in order to not commit war crimes presidents would need the precision targeting Palantir would provide. That’s the exact opposite of what the title implies.