• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    For completeness - sending children through the mail happened more than a century ago - the one was in 1915.

    I only mention this because the graphic showing USPS next to delivery services that didn’t even exist back then is misleading.

  • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    3 days ago

    Explanation:

    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/brief-history-children-sent-through-mail-180959372/

    One of the most overlooked, yet most significant innovations of the early 20th century might be the Post Office’s decision to start shipping large parcels and packages through the mail. While private delivery companies flourished during the 19th century, the Parcel Post dramatically expanded the reach of mail-order companies to America’s many rural communities, as well as the demand for their products. When the Post Office’s Parcel Post officially began on January 1, 1913, the new service suddenly allowed millions of Americans great access to all kinds of goods and services. But almost immediately, it had some unintended consequences as some parents tried to send their children through the mail.

    “Postage was cheaper than a train ticket,” Lynch says.

    Finally, on June 14, 1913, several newspapers including the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the Los Angeles Times all ran stories stating the the postmaster had officially decreed that children could no longer be sent through the mail.

    • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was full on expecting a baby to have ended up in one of those modern automated processing machines but this make a bit more sense I suppose

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I dont know what’s worse a parent losing their kid down the automatic mail belt or choosing to send their kid via mail to save a few pennies

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          save a few pennies

          Parcels tend to be an order of magnitude cheaper than transporting a person via trains, car/carriage etc. If you were poor, sending the kid via parcel might have been the only option to get them to a place. Though obviously it’s a piss-poor option, great way to kill, cripple or traumatize your child for life. Travelling via parcel might be doable for the 2-3 days a parcel might take today, but in those days parcels weren’t delivered that fast. Imagine being stuck in a dark, small box for 2 weeks.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            To be fair, pennies were worth a lot more in 1913.

            In 1913, 1 penny was worth 0.01 1913 dollars.

            Today, 1 penny is only worth 0.01 2026 dollars, so you can see it’s quite a difference.

          • bluesheep@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Good God I didn’t even realize that it would’ve easily taken more than a day to ship the child, that’s horrifying

          • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t understand. That seems impossible. The kid is shipped with several liters of water inside the box? And they just poop and pee in there?? And what kid would agree to that? It makes no sense. I feel like there must be more to this story.

  • Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    Life made more sense in the old days. If I package myself right, and want to send myself somewhere, why shouldn’t I be able to?

    • tpyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      From what I recall, if you can get a stamp and an address on it, it can go

      Let me look up the rules because I know very strangely shaped objects have to be delivered somehow. I think I remember a thing with coconuts

      Looked it up, straight from the horse’s mouth:

      https://facts.usps.com/delivering-coconuts/
      “Coconuts and potatoes can be mailed without a box. Simply write the destination and return addressees on your piece of produce and have it weighed for appropriate postage. USPS will ship it as-is.”

  • Curiousfur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    But we couldn’t mail a relative’s cellphone across the country by next day air after they forgot it here. Found that one out today. The sunchokes to a friend were fine, though.