• Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 year ago

    On top of everything else saying native Americans were cannibals is uniquely offensive.

    The whole idea of wendigos is its what happens to you if you consume human flesh.

    Entire villages committed mass suicide before winters if they didn’t have enough food so no one would have to resort to cannibalism.

    • iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 year ago

      There have been some indigenous cultures that genuinely practiced cannibalism such as the Wari’, but to imply it was commonplace is not only incorrect but also doing the work of (ironically cannibalistic) European colonizers.

    • Catfish [she/her]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      The W* (which is how you should refer to it because invoking it’s name is frowned upon) isn’t just some monster horror story. In my tribe and others it is a cannibalistic spirit that may possess you if invoked. That being said there are several tribes where folks do eat their ancestors as a part of their funeral practices.

        • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah its origin is probably closer to an uncanny valley “thing looks human but doesn’t act human and is dangerous.”

          There’s usually a kernel of truth in a lot of the old indigenous legends and stories. These become traditions and rituals over time but likely started as practices to guard against actual dangers. Like funerary practices. If you go with exposure you don’t leave the body near where you live. Or you bury the dead. You might do this to “respect the spirits” but it also prevents disease and/or attracting undesired animals to your location.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s the fault of Stephen King, not creepypastas, but now creepypastas endlessly imitate it just like most other spoopy things King wrote.

          • Smeagolicious [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            That one is super frustrating too - they just don’t give a shit about the origins at all, just treat it as a indigenous peoples themed slenderman why not

        • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          1 year ago

          it’s almost like different cultural traditions are different. It’s not a big ask that you when referencing a culture that has been the subject of sustained efforts to destroy it respect their terminology

            • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              you don’t have to believe it. It’s not imposing a belief on you to ask you to take your shoes off when you enter a mosque or your hat off in church. This is equivalent

              it’s asking for a small courtesy out of respect for their beliefs

              stop imposing your athiesm on them

              • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                never using a word because of a superstition* is not at all similar to a norm about not tracking dirt into a place, or a i don’t even know what you’re talking about hats, people wear hats in church all the fucking time.

                stop imposing your athiesm on them

                i don’t think a “version of bloody mary” is a deity.

                it’s asking for a small courtesy out of respect for their beliefs

                you’ll note i have not used the specific word, despite my position, but she said she doesn’t even believe in the thing. my understanding ore broadly of that sort of “spirits” superstition around the world is that the vast majority of people from cultures that have them don’t actually believe in them, so it’s incredibly weird to me that neurotypicals want this norm of treating with respect superstitions that aren’t even believed in by their culture of origin.

                • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  no hats in church is a rule at least where I am from and is a very old tradition. No shoes in a mosque is not just about mud it’s primarily about respect which is why churches ask you to take your hat off because you are supposed to treat the building with the respect you would someone’s home.

                  It’s just a courtesy signifying respect across cultures to not violate small traditions like this. The rule itself is not important it is the following that signifies that you care about their feelings and cultural values because you care about their culture. Not following the rule signifies deliberate disrespect.

                  Think it’s stupid all you want but there are social conventions for good and important reasons and they ease tensions across cultures. The conventions are a form of communication and if you don’t follow the convention people are going to assume you mean the same thing as the people who don’t follow the convention as a mark of deliberate disrespect.

                  It doesn’t matter whether or not you can understand why they value this rule they have told you it is important to them

                  • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    It doesn’t matter whether or not you can understand why they value this rule they have told you it is important to them

                    that’s all fine and dandy but again, “never use that (non-slur) word for a thing none of us actually believe in” is way more of an imposition on the rest of us than participating in norms at a specific place and time.

        • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          Catfish just explained that her tribe believes that the thing possesss you if you invoke it. She’s just trying not to get possessed by a cannibal spirit.

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        So in these stories, a person doesn’t “become” the creature but is instead possessed by it? Does doing cannibalism also in some manner attract or invoke it?

        Also, you are referring to it in the singular. Is there just one or is it sort of an “uncountable” presence or emanation or something?

        • Catfish [she/her]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are lots of ways to attract it like being greedy, performing or talking about cannibalism, or saying or thinking it’s name, probably other stuff. Lot of Native kids grow up horrified of it because it’s basically our version of Bloody Mary. Even if I don’t believe in it, it still scares me.

          I refer to it in the singular yeah, in most stories if it is a spirit there is only one of that kind. I can’t speak on the monstrous version but I assume that there can be multiple of them. It’s important to remember that there are a lot of different versions of these stories.

          • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            This makes sense, thanks. Yeah, I wasn’t asking about the Stephen King version because that’s basically a werewolf with extra steps.

            In any case, I always assumed that this was still a species of spirit (such that there could be multiple at a time) rather than an individual spirit. I suppose it’s sort of like what another religion might classify as a lesser deity or a specific, named demon like these.

    • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 year ago

      cannibalism has factually been practiced by many groups, including some indigenous to the americas. limiting it to US-occupied peoples i can’t think of any examples, but that isn’t what the OP asserted.

        • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          they’re the most prominent example i was thinking of, but generally not included in what angloamericans call ‘native americans’ so i was tryin to be diplomatic with the terms

            • Biggay [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              Generally yes? Most of the native/indigenous people I know only organize around/within the community theyre in, let alone another country(s). Most of the indigenous peoples i know though are from really small tribes though so shrug-outta-hecks Most anglos also dont even know what native tribes were once local in their area too

    • Outdoor_Catgirl [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t cannibalism as a practice more a thing in Indonesia on the other side of the world? Like kuru is a thing and if you need a word for disease from eating people’s brains, then there’s probably a non-insignificant amount of eating people. Not like mayos don’t ever eat people though. Europeans would grind up mummies and drink a tincture of the dust as a miracle medicine, which is pretty weird and gross.

    • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      The whole idea of wendigos is its what happens to you if you consume human flesh.

      I mostly thought they’re just Indigenous people talking about white people:

      hairy

      pale

      smells like shit

      insatiable greed